Jun 012013
 

Original story at ABC News

A new national program will encourage local fishers to get involved in projects to boost fish populations.

Tandanus tandanus

Tandanus tandanus. Photo © Gunther Schmida.
Tandanus tandanus are a currently a no-take species in South Australia.

Primary Industries and Regions SA hosted a forum in Renmark on Thursday night (30/5/2013) to introduce the Fishers for Fish Habitat scheme.

Program leader Keith Rowling says it aims to rehabilitate native fish habitats to increase populations and improve recreational fishing opportunities.

He says it has the potential to benefit both recreational fishers and the environment.

"Basically, any time you look at opportunities to improve fishing and to improve habitat there are people who are keen to get involved," he said.

"Sometimes it's just about being able to look at ways to get resources or looking at getting like-minded people together to get things moving."

He says an increase in catfish numbers could be enough to have the catfish fishing season reinstated.

"Any time you're looking at habitat and improving fish numbers it obviously then improves opportunities when it comes to decisions regarding species that can be caught by recreational fishers, so any improvement of habitat gives a greater opportunity for improved fish numbers," he said.

May 312013
 

Fishers are being reminded that Australian bass is off limits throughout Queensland from 1 June until 31 August 2013.

Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol District Manager Rob McDonald said the closure was in place to protect Australian bass during their breeding cycle.

"The annual closure period is vital to protecting Australian bass during vulnerable times," he said.

"The closed season allows stocks to replenish to ensure there are healthy fish stores for current and future generations of Queensland anglers."

Mr McDonald said an exception to the closed season applied in and from waterways upstream of:

  • Baroon Pocket, Bjelke-Peterson, Boondooma, Borumba, Cania, Cressbrook, Fred Haigh (Lake Monduran), Gordonbrook, Hinze, Lenthalls, Maroon, Moogerah, North Pine, Somerset, Waruma and Wivenhoe Dams
  • Claude Wharton and Jones Weirs
  • Isis Balancing Storage (Lake Gregory), Lake Dyer (Bill Gunn Dam) and Lake MacDonald.

"Anglers are reminded that size and possession limits still apply to Aussie bass taken from these waterways. The minimum size is 30cm and the possession limit is two," Mr McDonald said.

"QBFP officers conduct regular patrols during closed seasons and those found doing the wrong thing are risking an on-the-spot fine of $440 and a maximum penalty of $110 000."

For more information about recreational fishing rules or to download a copy of the Queensland Recreational Boating and Fishing Guide visit http://www.fisheries.qld.gov.au/.

Anyone who suspects or witnesses illegal fishing activity is encouraged to call the Fishwatch hotline on 1800 017 116.

Follow Fisheries Queensland on Facebook and Twitter (@FisheriesQld)


Media contact: Jodana Anglesey, 3087 8601

May 302013
 
Collapsible fish trap

Collapsible fish trap

This short video (including underwater footage) from YouTube user "barracod" demonstrates the use of the standard collapsible fish trap that many of our members use on field trips. The footage is taken at a spot on the North Pine River. Some of the species visible include Melanotaenia duboulayi (Crimsonspotted Rainbowfish), Craterocephalus stercusmuscarum (Flyspecked Hardyheads), gudgeons and others...

It's great to see recreational fishers who acknowledge fisheries regulations and respect the waterways they're using.

Click here to view at YouTube.

May 302013
 

The ConversationBy Tim Gray, Newcastle University

In European waters controlled by the EU Common Fisheries Policy, the discarding of fish overboard has long been condemned by environmentalists and regretted by fishers. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation the northeast Atlantic experiences the highest level of discards in the world, estimated at 1.3m tonnes a year. The European Commission estimates these discards account for a quarter (23%) of the total catch.

In the hold, but for how long? Wasting millions of tonnes of seafood is a tragedy. Maurice McDonald/PA Archive

In the hold, but for how long? Wasting millions of tonnes of seafood is a tragedy.
Maurice McDonald/PA Archive

Why throw away fish? Quotas regulate the amount of fish caught in particular fishing grounds over a period of time. As they are based on the fish landed at port, not caught at sea, fishers are legally obliged to discard any fish over their quota. They may also discard less valuable fish to make room for premium species, or throw overboard bycatch – anything deemed uncommercial, unwanted, or for which the skipper has no quota to land. Minimum Landing Size restrictions, designed to protect immature fish until they have had a chance to spawn, nevertheless apply only to landed fish, so those caught at sea must be thrown back.

Discarding is an extraordinary waste of a valuable natural resource. Almost all will be thrown back dead. Numerous efforts have been made to reduce the level of discarding, from nets designed to be species-specific and allow through immature fish, to fishing ground closures, or incentives for skippers to reduce discards. A more radical proposition has come from TV chef Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall’s Fish Fight campaign: a total EU discard ban.

Norway, Europe’s largest fisher, has banned discards on its vessels for 25 years. This year Sweden, Denmark and Norway introduced a discard ban on 15 species in the Skagerrak Straight that lies between the countries. But enforcing a ban is difficult in the waters of the North Sea where the greater variety of fish makes it harder to avoid bycatch.

However, the current fisheries policy reform has provided the opportunity to mobilise public support. In 2011, the European Commission presented proposals for an absolute discard ban. The following year the EU Fisheries Council agreed in principle, and in February the European Parliament voted by four to one for discard ban proposals. Their recommended phased implementation between 2014 and 2017, but this month EU Fisheries Ministers agreed a watered down package that allows a 5% discard rate, to be introduced between 2015 and 2019. This fell short of fish-loving environmentalists' demands, who will press the European Parliament to resist the dilution of the original proposals.

Proponents of a ban claim that discarding edible fish is ethically indefensible at a time when fish stocks are dwindling. A Seafish authority report drawn up by Cefas (the Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science) found many perfectly marketable uses for bycatch – human or animal consumption, organic fertiliser, frozen bait, and as biomass for energy generation. Fish meal and fish oil from discards could be used to meet the growing demand for fish farm feed and Omega 3 health supplements.

Those who oppose a blanket ban on discards point out that bycatch is unavoidable, and that it will be difficult to find outlets for landed fish for which no express demand exists. Commercial outlets are far from fishing ports, and the only three fishmeal plants in Britain are in Shetland, Aberdeen and Grimsby. Without established demand or market, the price (around £150 per tonne) will be too low for fishers to make a living. Conversely, opponents also claim that if the price paid was too high fishers would stop fishing selectively, turning the conservation aim of the ban on its head.

There are also practical problems: the cost of installing CCTV to monitor fishers at sea, and where to store bycatch – should it take up space in the cool room or be kept on deck to rot? Small fishing boats will be particularly hard hit, as their boats are unsuitable to equip with selective fishing gear and inshore waters by their nature contain many varied species.

It’s unclear on the final form an EU ban will take, but it is clear that there will be one – the political and public momentum in its favour is overwhelming. Almost a million people signed up to an online campaign, and the Fish Fight campaign itself was referred to by EU fisheries commissioner Maria Damanaki as key to driving negotiations forward.

In the 30-year history of the Common Fisheries Policy, there has never been a shift in policy that originated from such an upswell of popular demand. Perhaps now the policy will at last live up to its self-proclaimed mission of “consultative governance”.

Tim Gray does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.

The Conversation

This article was originally published at The Conversation.
Read the original article.

May 292013
 
Great white shark, Carcharodon carcharias

Great white shark, Carcharodon carcharias

Original story by Louis Sahagun at Phys.org (USA)

It's a mystery of the sea: How many great white sharks are prowling near California's surf lines? Some scientists say the population is large and healthy. Others say it is alarmingly small. No one has ever known for certain, but the question has become crucial this year.

State and federal authorities are weighing a request to classify the fish scientists know as Carcharodon carcharias as an endangered species worth preserving at all costs, a step that could, among other things, wipe out what's left of a gill net fishing industry that inadvertently snares great whites.

"This is a tough one - we are keenly aware that the scientific community is polarized on this issue," said Adrianna Shea, deputy chief of the California Department of Fish and Game Commission.

Great white sharks are apex predators, meaning they feed at the top of the food chain and are naturally low in abundance.

Few creatures possess the fearsome mystique of the white shark, which can reach 21 feet, weigh 3{ tons and hunts near surf lines shared by surfers, scuba divers and swimmers.

The  and the state Department of Fish and Wildlife have been researching the health of the great white population since last year, when the environmental groups Oceana, Shark Stewards and the  filed petitions calling for endangered species protection.

The groups were reacting to the first - and only - census of great whites ever attempted. Conducted by UC Davis and Stanford University researchers and published in the journal Biology Letters in 2011, the census estimated that only 219 adult and sub-adult great whites lived off the Central California coast, and perhaps again that many in the entire northeastern Pacific Ocean, including Southern California.

Other shark experts claim the actual population is several times larger, a legacy of state and federal laws curbing pollution, banning near-shore gill netting, protecting sharks and halting the slaughter of marine mammals they prey on.

The authors of the census study declined to comment on the merits of the petitions. However, one of the them, Sal Jorgensen, who is now a research scientist at the Monterey Bay Aquarium in Monterey, said, "I don't think there is an imminent threat.

The money being spent by the government to evaluate this issue would be better spent trying to evaluate this question: Is the number of white sharks rising or falling?"

The census was conducted from 2006 to 2008 on sharks that gather around Tomales Point, near Bodega Bay, and the Farallon Islands off the San Francisco coast from late July until late January.

The researchers assumed the population is closed during the study period, meaning no sharks leave or join the group, and that it returns to the area in precise annual homecomings, making reliable census estimates possible.

The researchers lured great whites close to their boat by slowly pulling a fake seal. They identified 131 individual sharks by the distinctive patterns of nicks, notches and scars on the trailing edge of their dorsal fins and then used mathematical models to calculate the likely population.

The lead authors of the study, Taylor Chapple, a doctoral student at UC Davis when the work was done, and Barbara Block, a professor in marine sciences at Stanford's Hopkins Marine Station in Pacific Grove, acknowledged that the estimate of 219 was lower than they expected for the Central California portion.

"It's a lot easier counting elephants and lions," Block said, referring to animal counts in Tanzania's Serengeti region. "But we're not off the mark by 2,000 sharks."

State and federal regulators, who are expected to make their decision on endangered species status this year, have conducted research and held hearings to analyze the accuracy of the census.

Among the rebuttals to the census is one from Michael L. Domeier, a leading shark expert and president of the Marine Conservation Science Institute.

Domeier's long-term monitoring of white sharks suggests the actual population is not closed and much larger. In a critique of the census, he said adult females do not always visit the coastal aggregation sites, and sub-adult white sharks are spread out over a much larger geographic area than adults.

George H. Burgess, curator of the Florida Museum of Natural History's International Shark Attack File, is among nine scientists nearing completion on a separate census study that will show that there are more than 2,000 adult and sub-adult white sharks off Central California. That study is expected to be submitted for review by state and federal regulators.

Chris Lowe, a professor of marine biology at Cal State Long Beach who has been conducting state and federally permitted white shark research since 2002, said, "The growth of the great white shark population is the most stunning recovery of a marine fish species we have."

On a recent weekday, Lowe watched as anglers lined a rail at Manhattan Beach Pier trying to snag halibut, bonito and yellowtail. Beneath the waves, a receiver he had installed was picking up the pings of transmitters attached to young white sharks.

"The potential for catching a great white shark off this pier is pretty good," he said.

Eric Martin, educational co-director of the Roundhouse Aquarium at the end of the pier, recalled a weekday last July when a fisherman hooked a 7-foot white shark. Martin explained that it was illegal to land the fish, but the fisherman refused to let it go.

Martin cut the line with a knife.

Until that day, four white sharks had been caught off the pier since 1980. Last year alone, anglers hooked four juvenile white sharks. A 7-footer was caught and released three weeks ago.

"I have a new strategy for dealing with fishermen and white sharks," Martin said with a smile. "I let the fisherman fight it as long as he wants. When the shark gets close, I take a picture of it and the fisherman. Then I urge him to let it go."

After that, Martin makes prints of the photos and gives them to the fisherman as souvenirs.

 

May 272013
 
Turtle caught in abandoned fish net. Ghost nets Australia, Alistair Dermer

Turtle caught in abandoned fish net. Ghost nets Australia, Alistair Dermer

Derelict fishing nets, known as ghost nets, are a major environmental scourge on Australia's northern coastline.

Over the past decade nearly 13,000 have been removed thanks to the efforts of an alliance of more than 30 indigenous communities across WA, the Northern Territory and Queensland.

But that's all about to come to an end because of a lack of funding.

Listen to the story at ABC Radio National

Find out more about Ghost Nets at GhostNets Australia

May 252013
 

By Scott Levi, ABC Online

Retreat Maccas Peter ByronYour fishing licence money in NSW is being used to help save a wonderful freshwater sports fish, the mighty Macquarie Perch. Luke Pearce, from NSW Fisheries, takes us to the Retreat River where they have successfully released these endangered fish in the wild. Check out the photo from Peter Byron.

KanangraAnd, what lengths will fishers go to to wet a line? This photo says it all. We are getting some great pics from our Big Fish listeners, keen to share their most beautiful fishing spots. This one, from Tim Williams,would have to rank as one of the most inaccessible and extreme as well. You can listen to adventure angler Tim, on combining canyoning, abseiling and fishing on this week's The Big Fish.

May 232013
 

Original story: Warwick Daily News

People from the Condamine Alliance, Warwick Fish Stocking Association and YWCA work experience program in Toowoomba worked hard on the fish hotels.  Erin Smith

People from the Condamine Alliance, Warwick Fish Stocking Association and YWCA work experience program in Toowoomba worked hard on the fish hotels. Erin Smith

It might just look like a pile of wood sitting on the banks of the Condamine River but these carefully designed structures will soon help improve the population of native fish in the river.

Condamine Alliance principal project officer Kevin Graham said "the hotels and cod holes" would act as a replacement for the recently removed willow trees.

"In the past we have relied on snags in the river to provide homes for our native fish, but with the increasing in clearing over the years there are no longer enough large trees becoming snags so our fish need an extra hand," he said.

The structures will be weighed down with cement sleepers when they are installed by the Southern Downs Regional Council next week. The fish hotels have been built by the YWCA in Toowoomba, who have been working on this project with their work experience program.

And the construction of the first fish hotels is not the only thing the Condamine Alliance is celebrating.

The natural resource group was named a finalist in the United National Association of Australia World Environment Day Awards.

May 232013
 

Original story by Adam Hinterhuer, the University of Wisconsin News

The fate of the blue catfish and more than 60 other species of large-river specialist fishes depends on conservation of suitable habitat and connectivity between the Mississippi River and its tributaries.  Photo: Brenda Pracheil

The fate of the blue catfish and more than 60 other species of large-river specialist fishes depends on conservation of suitable habitat and connectivity between the Mississippi River and its tributaries. Photo: Brenda Pracheil

Large-river specialist fishes — from giant species like paddlefish and blue catfish, to tiny crystal darters and silver chub — are in danger, but researchers say there is greater hope to save them if major tributaries identified in a University of Wisconsin-Madison study become a focus of conservation efforts.

The study says 60 out of 68 U.S. species, or 88 percent of fish species found exclusively in large-river ecosystems like the Mississippi, Missouri and Ohio rivers, are of state, federal or international conservation concern. The report is in the April issue of the journal Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

On the other hand, says lead author Brenda Pracheil, a postdoctoral researcher in the UW's Center for Limnology, the study offers some good news, too.

Brenda Pracheil with a longnose gar caught in the Missouri River. Photo: Brenda Pracheil.

Brenda Pracheil with a longnose gar caught in the Missouri River. Photo: Brenda Pracheil.

Traditionally, the conservation emphasis has been on restoring original habitat. This task proves impossible for ecosystems like the main trunk of the Mississippi River — the nation's shipping, power production, and flood control backbone. While the locks, dams and levees that make the Mississippi a mighty economic force have destroyed fish habitat by blocking off migration pathways and changing annual flood cycles species need to spawn, removing them is not a realistic conservation option.

But, says Pracheil, we're underestimating the importance of tributaries. Her study found that, for large-river specialist fish, it's not all or nothing. Some rivers are just big enough to be a haven.

For any river in the Mississippi Basin with a flow rate of less than 166 cubic meters of water per second, virtually no large-river specialist fishes are present. But in any river that even slightly exceeds that rate, 80 percent or more of the large-river species call it home.

That means Mississippi tributaries about the size of the Wisconsin River and larger are providing crucial habitat for large-river fishes. When coupled with current efforts in the large rivers themselves, these rivers may present important opportunities for saving species.

"Talk to any large-river fish biologist, and they will tell you how important tributaries are to big river fish," says Pracheil. "But, until now, we've not really understood which rivers are most important. Our study tackles that and shows which tributaries in the Mississippi River Basin show the most promise for conservation of large-river fishes."

Current policies governing large river restoration projects are funded largely through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which requires that funds be spent on mainstems — or the big rivers themselves. Pracheil's study suggests spending some of that money on tributary restoration projects might do more conservation good for fish, while also letting agencies get more bang for their habitat restoration buck.

"Tributaries may be one of our last chances to preserve large-river fish habitat," Pracheil says. "Even though the dam building era is all but over in this country, it's just starting on rivers like the Mekong and Amazon —places that are hotspots for freshwater fish diversity. While tributaries cannot offer a one-to-one replacement of main river habitats, our work suggests that [they] provide important refuges for large-river fishes and that both main rivers and their tributaries should be considered in conservation plans."

Journal referenceBrenda M Pracheil, Peter B McIntyre, and John D Lyons (2013) Enhancing conservation of large-river biodiversity by accounting for tributaries. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11:3, 124-128

May 212013
 

Overfishing has reduced fish populations and biodiversity across much of the world's oceans. In response, fisheries are increasingly reliant on a handful of highly valuable shellfish. However, new research by the University of York shows this approach to be extremely risky.

The ecological effects of intensive fishing. From left to right, fishing effort increases over time. As a result, large predatory fish become depleted and fishers are forced to target new species.

The ecological effects of intensive fishing. From left to right, fishing effort increases over time. As a result, large predatory fish become depleted and fishers are forced to target new species.

The research, published May 20, in the journal Fish and Fisheries, shows that traditional fisheries targeting large predators such as cod and haddock, have declined over the past hundred years. In their place, catches of shellfish such as prawns, scallops and lobsters have rocketed as they begin to thrive in unnaturally predator-low environments often degraded by the passage of trawls and dredges.

In many places, including the UK, shellfish are now the most valuable marine resource. The research by the Environment Department at York suggests that although a shellfish-dominated ecosystem appears beneficial from an economic perspective, it is highly risky. Like simplified agricultural systems, these shellfisheries are unstable in the long-term and at great risk of collapse from disease, species invasions and climate change. Warming and acidification of our oceans due to greenhouse gas emissions is expected to affect shellfish worst. Ocean acidification, in particular, will limit the ability of scallops and other shellfish to form proper shells, and lead to widespread mortality.

Lead author, Leigh Howarth, says: “Prawns are now the most valuable fishery in the UK, with catches currently worth over £110 million a year. But this fishery has come to exist only after we overexploited populations of cod, haddock and other predators. If shellfish now collapsed the social consequences for fishermen would be devastating. There are simply very few remaining species left to target.”

The study reports similar findings from all over the world. In the United States and Canada, catches of lobster, scallops and crab have also come to dominate following the collapse of cod. However, disease and climate change again put these species at great risk. While in the Black Sea, Baltic and off the west coast of Africa, overfishing of large predators have caused the ecosystems to become overrun with jellyfish, resulting in severe oxygen depletion and eruptions of hydrogen sulphide, thereby wiping out important food chains across 100,000 square kilometres of seabed.

Co-author Dr Bryce Stewart adds: “Shellfish make a valuable contribution to our fisheries. But we cannot just assume everything is rosy. There is an urgent need for continued improvements in management of finfish fisheries, and an ecosystem approach which rebuilds the diversity, resilience and productivity of our oceans into the future.”

Co-author Professor Callum Roberts concludes: “The rise of shellfish has been welcomed by many as a lifeline for the fishing industry. However, such changes are not a result of successful management, but rather a result of management failure, a failure to protect stocks and their habitats in the face of industry innovation and overfishing. This study highlights why the UK needs to urgently act to protect our seas. We need more marine protected areas to stop our seas from becoming a wasteland and to restore the diversity and productivity of fisheries well into the future.”

Original media release at the University of York

Journal Reference: Howarth, L. M., Roberts, C. M., Thurstan, R. H. and Stewart, B. D. (2013),The unintended consequences of simplifying the sea: making the case for complexity. Fish and Fisheries. doi: 10.1111/faf.12041