Aug 082013
 

Original story by Bill Hoffman, Sunshine Coast Daily

Climate ChaneTHE reality of climate change, which is already dramatically affecting the distribution of marine life, will ultimately become impossible for humans to ignore.

That's the personal view of University of the Sunshine Coast scientist David Schoeman, who has contributed to a three-year study which found that warming oceans are driving changes in breeding patterns and the geographic distribution of marine organisms, pushing them rapidly towards the north and south poles.

The biostatistics expert said the shift would lead to rapid changes in the hierarchy of the food chain as climate pinch points forced both environmental shifts and biological changes.

More tropical species will be seen off our own coastline. Whether that will include deadly marine stingers from Australia's northern tropics would be influenced by a range of factors.

Dr Schoeman contributed to a three-year study led by the CSIRO's Climate Adaptation Flagship and University of Queensland marine ecologists Dr Elvira Poloczanska and Associate Professor Anthony Richardson into the impacts of ocean warming, which was occurring at a third of the rate as on land.

Until now most studies had focused on the response of land-based organisms with little research into impacts on marine life.

However the temperature impacts in the ocean are profound.

The study discovered species shifting towards the poles at the rate of 72km every 10 years compared with 6km each decade on land.

Stocks of key recreational and commercial species are expected to be compromised.

Dr Schoeman said organisms at the bottom of the food chain with shorter life spans were adapting quicker than fish, which would quickly lead to changes in the food chain.

Dr Schoeman said areas like the Sunshine and Gold Coast were climate change hot spots.

Aug 082013
 

Sewerage systems can’t cope with more extreme weatherOriginal story by Jenny Davis, Monash University at The Conversation

Anyone flushing a toilet in urban Australia today does so confident that they’ll never again see the thing they’ve flushed. They probably also think they are causing minimal environmental harm, thanks to our well-designed wastewater treatment plants. But is our lack of concern for sewage pollution well founded? Recents events in northern Tasmania suggest not.

Dredging of Tasmania’s Tamar Estuary reveals our sewerage systems aren’t coping so well. Photo: Ian Kidd

Dredging of Tasmania’s Tamar Estuary reveals our sewerage systems aren’t coping so well. Photo: Ian Kidd

Launceston sits on the Tamar River estuary, in northern Tasmania. Residents have long been concerned about poor water quality and excessive sedimentation in the estuary. A recent study suggests the problem could be solved – or at least ameliorated – by releasing environmental flows from a hydroelectric dam and restoring wetlands to help the tide flush away sediment.

But meanwhile, the local government has decided to rake the Tamar’s silt as a stop-gap measure. This involves dragging a large rake from the stern of a fishing boat, stirring up the fine sediments that are then washed downstream on an ebb tide.

But the raking has brought unexpected consequences: it has exposed the size of Launceston’s sewage problem. Photos taken after a recent raking session on July 7, 2013, reveal a rake clogged with tampon strings. It’s been happening so often the rake operator has had to come up with a novel means of disentangling the strings from his equipment. He takes the rake home and burns the strings off in a fire in his backyard.

Old sewerage infrastructure can’t cope with changing conditions. Photo: Jenny Davis

Old sewerage infrastructure can’t cope with changing conditions. Photo: Jenny Davis

Why is there layer of tampon strings on the bed of the Tamar River estuary? The answer lies in ageing urban infrastructure. Launceston was established in 1806 – it is Australia’s third oldest city – and it now supports a regional population of 90,000. The sewage and stormwater runoff from older parts of the city are combined.

During high rainfall the secondary treatment plants cannot cope with the sudden increase in stormwater. So all wastewater (stormwater and raw sewage) is released directly into the estuary.

The old mantra “the solution to pollution is dilution” cannot be applied here: heavy rain does not make things better. Without intervention, wastes will continue to slosh backwards and forwards on the estuary’s tides, continuing to create the problems now so evident on Launceston’s doorstep.

The problem is made worse by the lack of tertiary treatment. Launceston has long needed a tertiary treatment plant but the cost, which will be borne by Tasmanian ratepayers, is large.

The tampon strings are not the major issue here – rather they are indisputable, physical evidence of the extent of sewage pollution. Normally such large amounts of decomposing organic material in the upper estuary would trigger toxic cyanobacterial blooms during warmer summer months.

But the low level of light in the estuary, caused by the naturally turbid waters, may be preventing this – the algae needs light to grow. However, cyanobacterial blooms are now becoming common in the clear waters of Trevallyn Lake further upstream on the South Esk River.

The problem of sewage overflows into natural waterways and wetlands is not restricted to Launceston. Sewage pumping stations throughout Australia are often close to streams or wetlands. The waterways are meant to be emergency receiving points when pumps fail or systems become overloaded.

As a freshwater ecologist I have worked on wetlands in both Perth (North Lake) and Melbourne (Huntingdale Lake) degraded by sewage spills. This form of organic pollution results in massive de-oxygenation, fish kills, bird deaths and swarms of nuisance insects (mosquitoes and midges).

The issue of how we deal with our waste products is one of the most pressing problems facing our planet. Under the global climate scenarios of increasing temperatures and more extreme events such as floods and droughts, the pollution caused by floods may cause more harm than previously recognised. The Launceston issue is a timely warning.

We have to ensure that urban wastewater infrastructure is designed to cope with extreme conditions. We need to understand how bad water quality can get if you combine organic pollution and a warming climate. If we don’t, the important biodiversity, recreational and aesthetic values of urban wetlands will disappear and the risk of water-borne and mosquito-borne diseases will increase.

These are scenarios we must not ignore.

Jenny Davis does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.

The Conversation

This article was originally published at The Conversation.
Read the original article.

Aug 082013
 

Original story by Brian Williams, the Courier Mail

AN investigation into the dumping of thousands of fish in a wetland area of Moreton Island National Park last month has failed to find a culprit.

Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol has investigated fish dumped at Yellow Patch in the Moreton Island National Park. Photo: Supplied

Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol has investigated fish dumped at Yellow Patch in the Moreton Island National Park. Photo: Supplied

A Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol spokeswoman said one commercial fishing operation was operating on the island off Brisbane last month and was spoken to in relation to fisheries and national park matters.

"The source of the dumped fish could not be fully determined,'' she said. "QBFP discussed with the fisher the need to better manage fishing operations in terms of by-catch.''

Dumping of any material, including by-catch, in a national park is not permitted.

Fisheries staff also plan to take up the issue with commercial fishing industry representatives.

Some of the fish were identified as tailor but it was impossible to determine their size because of decomposition. Fisheries officers could also not determine why the fish had been dumped on the northern part of the island, although netting activities are known to occur there.

"Unfortunately, we have been unable to issue any fines due to the decomposed nature of the fish and interaction with wild pigs, making it difficult to determine whether the fish were of legal size, or confirm who was responsible,'' the spokeswoman said.

QBFP will raise the issue at an industry meeting and will start patrols in the area. The island will remain open to commercial fishing and visitors should phone 1800 017 116 to report suspected illegal activities.

Sunfish spokeswoman Judy Lynne said illegal netting had been occurring on the island for years and successive governments had done nothing about it.

She had personally contacted the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service and Queensland Fisheries more than 10 times in five years with no results.

Island residents and fishermen have complained that it was not the first time fish had been dumped.

Illegal dumping of all sorts of products has been a major issue in Queensland for decades and carries penalties ranging up to $110,000.

Aug 082013
 

Original story by Peter Spinks, Fairfax at The Age

Blue-green algae in Fishery Creek near Maitland in NSW. Photo: mkelly

Blue-green algae in Fishery Creek near Maitland in NSW. Photo: mkelly

First, the bad news: because of climate change and worsening water pollution, algae, the world's fastest-growing photosynthetic organisms, are proliferating worldwide. A few of these are of the toxic blue-green variety.

The good news is that some strains of algae can be converted into an alternative source of renewable energy that is commercially viable.

"Newly trialled native species provide real hope," says Evan Stephens of Queensland University's Institute for Molecular Bioscience and manager of the Solar Biofuels Research Centre.

"There are roughly 350,000 species of algae – more than all higher plants – around the world," he says. By isolating strains from native Australian waters, and then screening them against a set of criteria for producing fuel, scientists can breed new and improved varieties.

"By new strains, we mean algae varieties that have not been previously isolated, characterised and identified for fuels," Dr Stephens says.

Genetic engineering helps scientists determine traits that may improve yields and other qualities. "But in most cases we can go back and rescreen libraries of isolates for these characteristics which are naturally occurring," he explains.

Working with Germany's Bielefeld University and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, the Australian scientists have identified fast-growing and hardy algae that could lead to cheaper and more efficiently produced biofuels.

Previous research concentrated on finding oil-rich algae. "Usually these are not fast-growing and are tastier to predators – like microscopic scoops of ice-cream," he says.

The resultant bio-crude oil can be processed in existing petroleum oil refineries, with no need for additional infrastructure. "This is important as new infrastructure is expensive," Dr Stephens says. "We can make the same things from bio-crude that we make from regular crude – namely petrol, diesel, aviation fuel and plastics."

A new frontier is in the biology and developing of new strains that grow stably, while exhibiting resistance to predators and temperature fluctuations.

Dr Stephens and his team identified hundreds of native species of microscopic algae from freshwater and saltwater environments around Australia. These were tested against thousands of environmental conditions in the laboratory, creating a shortlist of top performers.

The researchers are currently trialling the algae at a pilot processing plant at Pinjarra Hills, Queensland, which opened in April.

Traditionally, algae have been grown for health foods, aquaculture and waste-water treatment. In recent years, algae oil has become the focus of an emerging biofuel industry. Its production is still expensive, however, and viable commercial production has not yet been achieved in Australia or overseas.

"While we know that we can produce algae oil that is even higher quality than standard petroleum sources, we are working to increase the efficiency of production with the ultimate aim being able to compete with fossil fuels dollar for dollar," Dr Stephens says.

Algae in profile

Found anywhere from oceans, lakes and swamps to soils, rocks and icy mountain tops, algae harness solar energy to convert greenhouse gas into just about everything we need.

Algae accumulate up to 80 per cent of their dry weight in oil. Their biomass can double every eight to 12 hours, and they produce oil year-round, unlike most seasonal crops, says Aidyn Mouradov, a plant biotechnologist at RMIT University in Bundoora.

Algae are more productive, he says, than other energy crops such as corn, soy or oil palm. "For example, algae can produce 10 times more than palm oil and require 10 times less land area." This is important as biofuel crops have occupied valuable arable land that could otherwise be used to grow food.

Algae farming requires neither agricultural land – the micro-organisms can be grown on land too poor to use for traditional crops – nor clean, fresh water. "They thrive on saline, brackish and waste waters," Associate Professor Mouradov says, noting that they can be grown on excess nutrients in sewage waste water. "This leads to a win-win situation with a waste turned into an asset."

Finally, algae can produce a range of value-added products: ethanol, hydrogen, pigments, biopolymers and food for animals and humans. To top it off, they make great bio-fertilisers. "These are getting popular because they are eco-friendly and more cost-effective than chemical fertilisers," Professor Mouradov says.

Trials

Bunker fuel used by ships is highly polluting, so any attempt to replace it with algal oil would benefit the environment.

With this in mind, Maersk, the world's biggest shipping company, recently tested a mix of algal oil and bunker fuel on a ship sailing from Europe to India. The US Navy, meanwhile, trialled algal fuel on a decommissioned destroyer. Both experiments proved successful.

Several experiments using algal oil for aircraft jet engines have also shown promise.

And, in a move greeted with caution by GM sceptics, US biotechnologist Craig Venter, who first sequenced the human genome, plans to genetically engineer algal fuel that could be grown and harvested in the oceans.

Carbon guzzlers

As with all bio-derived fuels, algae remove carbon dioxide from the air as they grow. So the fuel produced is carbon-neutral.

This is different to burning fossil fuels, where carbon that has been locked underground for millions of years is put back into the atmosphere. If algae are recruited to make hydrogen, then one is taking carbon dioxide out of the air, and making a fuel that is carbon-free.

Algae are more versatile and adaptable than higher plants: they can be grown anywhere there is sunlight and water. Areas that are too dry, too hot, or too cold to support trees or other plants can still potentially be used for algae.

Farming potential

Deserts are an obvious place for algae farms, since the land cannot be used for much else and there is abundant sunlight. The issue there is providing water and other nutrients – nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and iron. But this is not difficult using a closed system where the water is trapped, and cannot evaporate.

Challenges for algal farming include the mechanics of harvesting the algae, in post-processing – for instance, converting natural algal oils into biodiesel – and in the risk of virus contamination. All monocultures, whether plants, animals or algae, are unstable ecosystems, and are at higher risk of being wiped out by viral pathogens compared with complex multi-species ecosystems.

A variety of viruses are known to prey on algae; these could enter algae farms in water or by wind.

With plentiful sunshine and wide-open spaces, Australia is ideally placed to farm algae. Scaling up algae production for commercial use has been an issue since the early days of interest in algal production, says Susan Blackburn of CSIRO's Energy Transformed Flagship low cost algal fuels and head of the Australian National Algae Culture Collection.

Her research team has tested and characterised the diversity of algae for biofuels and other products. "We have a considerable database of characteristics," Dr Blackburn says. "Now we are developing a partnership with a multinational that wants to invest in R&D in Australia to take some of our strains forward."

CSIRO scientists have also developed high-production technologies for microalgae and they have economic models relevant for Australia, she says.

The best way to produce algae for commercial purposes, Dr Blackburn notes, is using photo-bioreactors that maximise the availability of light. "As well as light for growth, microalgae require nutrients rather like a hydroponics system," Dr Blackburn says. "Supplying the necessary nutrients in sufficient quantities is a challenge." One way to address this, she says, is to use municipal wastewater systems.

The CSIRO is developing a management system for algal fuels. "We also have a wealth of knowledge on Australian native microalgae and a bank of more than 1000 strains in the Australian National Algae Culture Collection," Dr Blackburn says. The collection also holds strains with potential for aviation fuel.

Aurora Algae, a US-based company, has invested in commercial algal production for biofuels in Australia. "It will surely be followed soon by others," Dr Blackburn says.

"If we devoted just 1 per cent of our land mass to algae farming, we could theoretically produce five times more oil than we currently consume and potentially become an oil exporter, rather than an importer," Dr Stephens says.

Facts and figures

Commercial algae productivity currently benchmarks at around 70 tonnes of dried biomass per hectare per year, Dr Stephens explains: ''Having said that, many species cannot achieve this.''

Sugarcane is one of Australia’s most productive crops, and also achieves 70 tonnes per hectare per year, but these harvests are measured in wet weight (in other words, 80 per cent moisture). So algae are about five times more productive than sugarcane. ''For sugarcane, much of the harvest is fibrous or woody biomass, compared to a relatively uniform and useable product when using algae,'' Dr Stephens says.

Although crop farming is unlikely to improve any time soon, global research efforts are raising total algae production efficiency towards the 4 to 5 per cent mark. ''This could halve, or slightly better, the 1 per cent of Australian land needed to produce five times Australia’s oil consumption,'' Dr Stephens says.

Algae cannot compete with solar photovoltaic or solar thermal energy just in terms of energy conversion, but electricity only represents 20 per cent of global energy consumption so the need for renewable fuels is currently greater.

''No single biofuel system can completely replace the current massive amount of petroleum used, so a suite of different biofuel technologies will be required,'' Dr Stephens says.

Links

Check out the presentation Dr Blackburn gave last year at: http://sapmea.asn.au/conventions/apcab2012/index.html

Discover what commercial products come from algae at: www.botgard.ucla.edu/html/botanytextbooks/economicbotany/Algae/index.html

CSIRO program details at: www.csiro.au/energy

Learn about the Australian National Algae Culture Collection at: www.csiro.au/ANACC

VCAA links

VCE Biology: www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/vce/biology/BiologySD-2013.pdf

AusVELS Biological sciences: http://ausvels.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Science/Curriculum/F-10

 

 

Aug 072013
 

Original story at Phys.org

Oceans cover 71 percent of the Earth's surface, yet our knowledge of the impact of climate change on marine habitats is a mere drop in the proverbial ocean compared to terrestrial systems. An international team of scientists set out to change that by conducting a global meta-analysis of climate change impacts on marine systems.

Warming oceans are causing marine species to change breeding, feeding, and migration timing. Credit: University of California - Santa Barbara

Warming oceans are causing marine species to change breeding, feeding, and migration timing. Credit: University of California - Santa Barbara

Counter to previous thinking, marine species are shifting their geographic distribution toward the poles and doing so much faster than their land-based counterparts. The findings were published in Nature Climate Change.
The three-year study, conducted by a working group of UC Santa Barbara's National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS) and funded by the National Science Foundation, shows that warming oceans are causing marine species to change breeding, feeding, and migration timing as well as shift where they live. Widespread systemic shifts in measures such as distribution of species and phenology—the timing of nature's calendar—are on a scale comparable to or greater than those observed on land.

"The leading edge or front-line of marine is moving toward the poles at an average of 72 kilometers (about 45 miles) per decade—considerably faster than terrestrial species, which are moving poleward at an average of 6 kilometers (about 4 miles) per decade," said lead author Elvira Poloczanska, a research scientist with Australia's national science agency, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Marine and Atmospheric Research in Brisbane. "And this is occurring even though are warming three times slower than land temperatures."

The report, which involved scientists from 17 institutions, including NCEAS associates Carrie Kappel and Ben Halpern and former NCEAS postdoctoral associates Mary O'Connor, Lauren Buckley, and Camille Parmesan, forms part of the Fifth Assessment Report of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC). The Geneva-based IPCC assesses scientific, technical, and socioeconomic information concerning , its potential effects, and options for adaptation and mitigation.

"The effects of climate change on have not been a major focus of past IPCC reports because no one had done the work to pull together all the disparate observations from around the world," said Kappel. "This study provides a solid basis for including marine impacts in the latest global accounting of how climate change is affecting our world."

Unlike previous climate change assessments, which relied heavily on terrestrial data to estimate marine impacts, the NCEAS working group scientists gathered from seven countries to assemble a large marine-only database of 1,735 changes in marine life from the global peer-reviewed literature. The biological changes were documented from time series, with an average length of 40 years of observation.

"Here's a totally different system with its own unique set of complexities and subtleties," said Camille Parmesan, professor in the Department of Integrative Biology at University of Texas at Austin. "Yet the overall impacts of recent climate change remain the same: an overwhelming response of species shifting where and when they live in an attempt to track a shifting climate.

"This is the first comprehensive documentation of what is happening in our marine systems in relation to climate change," added Parmesan. "What it reveals is that the changes occurring on land are being matched by the oceans. And far from being a buffer and displaying more minor changes, what we're seeing is a far stronger response from the oceans." Parmesan has been active in IPCC since 1997, and in her capacity as a lead author, she shared in the award of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize to IPCC.

The research revealed telltale traces that collectively build the case for climate change causing modifications in the ocean. These fingerprints of climate change include movements of species toward the poles as ocean temperatures rise, with an average displacement up to ten times that for terrestrial species. Phytoplankton, zooplankton, and bony fish showed the largest shifts.

Researchers also found that the timing of spring events in the oceans had advanced by more than four days, nearly twice the figure for land. The strength of response varied among species, but again, the research showed the greatest response—up to 11 days in advancement—occurred in invertebrate zooplankton and larval bony fish.

Multiple lines of evidence supported the hypothesis that climate change is the primary driver behind the observed changes: for example, opposing responses in warm-water and cold-water within a community and similar responses from discrete populations at the same range edge. In total, 81 percent of all observations, whether for distribution, phenology, community composition, abundance, or demography, across different populations and ocean basins were consistent with the expected impacts of climate change.

Aug 062013
 

Media release from UCSanDiego

If current climate trends follow historical precedent, ocean ecosystems will be in state of flux for next 10,000 years, according to Scripps Oceanography researchers.

If history’s closest analog is any indication, the look of the oceans will change drastically in the future as the coming greenhouse world alters marine food webs and gives certain species advantages over others.

Coral Gardens: A school of surgeonfish cruise coral reefs near Palmyra Atoll. Photo: UCSD

Coral Gardens: A school of surgeonfish cruise coral reefs near Palmyra Atoll. Photo: UCSD

Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, paleobiologist Richard Norris and colleagues show that the ancient greenhouse world had few large reefs, a poorly oxygenated ocean, tropical surface waters like a hot tub, and food webs that did not sustain the abundance of large sharks, whales, seabirds, and seals of the modern ocean. Aspects of this greenhouse ocean could reappear in the future if greenhouse gases continue to rise at current accelerating rates.

The researchers base their projections on what is known about the “greenhouse world” of 50 million years ago when levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere were much higher than those that have been present during human history. Their review article appears in an Aug. 2 special edition of the journal Science titled “Natural Systems in Changing Climates.”

For the past million years, atmospheric CO2 concentrations have never exceeded 280 parts per million, but industrialization, forest clearing, agriculture, and other human activities have rapidly increased concentrations of CO2 and other gases known to create a “greenhouse” effect that traps heat in the atmosphere. For several days in May 2013, CO2 levels exceeded 400 parts per million for the first time in human history and that milestone could be left well behind in the next decades. At its current pace, Earth could recreate the CO2 content of the atmosphere in the greenhouse world in just 80 years.

In the greenhouse world, fossils indicate that CO2 concentrations reached 800-1,000 parts per million. Tropical ocean temperatures reached 35º C (95º F), and the polar oceans reached 12°C (53°F)—similar to current ocean temperatures offshore San Francisco. There were no polar ice sheets. Scientists have identified a “reef gap” between 42 and 57 million years ago in which complex coral reefs largely disappeared and the seabed was dominated by piles of pebble-like single-celled organisms called foraminifera.

“The ‘rainforests-of-the-sea’ reefs were replaced by the ‘gravel parking lots’ of the greenhouse world,” said Norris.

Changing marine life characteristics: Comparison of present, past, and future ocean ecosystemstates. Image: Science

Changing marine life characteristics: Comparison of present, past, and future ocean ecosystemstates. Image: Science

The greenhouse world was also marked by differences in the ocean food web with large parts of the tropical and subtropical ocean ecosystems supported by minute picoplankton instead of the larger diatoms typically found in highly productive ecosystems today. Indeed, large marine animals—sharks, tunas, whales, seals, even seabirds—mostly became abundant when algae became large enough to support top predators in the cold oceans of recent geologic times.

“The tiny algae of the greenhouse world were just too small to support big animals,” said Norris. “It’s like trying to keep lions happy on mice instead of antelope; lions can’t get by on only tiny snacks.”

Within the greenhouse world, there were rapid warming events that resemble our projected future. One well-studied event is known as the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) 56 million years ago, which serves as a guide to predicting what may happen under current climate trends.

That event lasted about 200,000 years and warmed the earth by 5-9° C (9-16° F) with massive migrations of animals and plants and shifts in climate zones. Notably, despite the disruption to Earth’s ecosystems, the extinction of species was remarkably light, other than a mass extinction in the rapidly warming deep ocean.

“In many respects the PETM warmed the world more than we project for future climate change, so it should come as some comfort that extinctions were mostly limited to the deep sea,” said Norris. “Unfortunately, the PETM also shows that ecological disruption can last tens of thousands of years.”

Indeed, Norris added that continuing the fossil fuel economy even for decades magnifies the period of climate instability. An abrupt halt to fossil fuel use at current levels would limit the period of future climate instability to less than 1,000 years before climate largely returns to pre-industrial norms. But, if fossil fuel use stays on its current trajectory until the end of this century, then the climate effects begin to resemble those of the PETM, with major ecological changes lasting for 20,000 years or more and a recognizable human “fingerprint” on Earth’s climate lasting for 100,000 years.

Co-authors of the review are Sandra Kirtland-Turner of Scripps Oceanography, Pincelli Hull of Yale University, and Andy Ridgwell of the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom.

Reference:  D. Norris, S. K. Turner, P. M. Hull, A. Ridgwell. Marine Ecosystem Responses to Cenozoic Global Change. Science, 2013; 341 (6145): 492 DOI: 10.1126/science.1240543

Aug 052013
 

Media release by University of Plymouth at EurekAlert!

Warming oceans are causing marine species to change breeding times and shift homes with expected substantial consequences for the broader marine landscape, according to a new global study.

The three-year research project, funded by the National Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis in California, has shown widespread systemic shifts in measures such as distribution of species and phenology – the timing of nature's calendar – on a scale comparable to or greater than those observed on land.

The report, Global imprint of climate change on marine life, will form part of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change Assessment Report due for publication in 2014, and is published in this month's Nature Climate Change. It was undertaken by eminent scientists at 17 institutions across the world, including the University of Queensland, Plymouth University, Aberystwyth University, and the Scottish Association for Marine Science (SAMS).

Photomontage of planktonic organisms. Image: Kils, WikiMedia Commons

Photomontage of planktonic organisms. Image: Kils, WikiMedia Commons

One of the lead authors of the report, Professor Camille Parmesan, National Marine Aquarium Chair in Public Understanding of Oceans and Human Health within Plymouth University's Marine Institute, said the study offered a "very simple, but important message".

Professor Parmesan said: "This is the first comprehensive documentation of what is happening in our marine systems in relation to climate change. What it reveals is that the changes that are occurring on land are being matched by the oceans. And far from being a buffer and displaying more minor changes, what we're seeing is a far stronger response from the oceans."

The research team assembled a large database of 1,735 changes in marine life from the global peer-reviewed literature which helped them investigate impacts of climate change. The team found that 81% of changes were in a direction consistent with climate change.

The evidence showed that the leading edge or 'front line' of some marine species, such as phytoplankton, zooplankton and bony fish, is moving towards the poles at the average rate of 72km per decade, which is considerably faster than the terrestrial average of 6km per decade – and this despite the fact that sea surface temperatures are warming three times slower than land temperatures.

They also found that spring phenology in the oceans had advanced by more than four days, nearly twice the figure for phenological advancement on land. The strength of response varied among species, but again, the research showed the greatest response in invertebrate zooplankton and larval bony fish, up to 11 days in advancement.

Professor Mike Burrows at SAMS said: "Most of the effects we saw were as expected from changes in climate. So, most shifts in the distributions of, say, fishes and corals, were towards the poles, and most events in springtime, like spawning, were earlier."

Some of the most convincing evidence that climate change is the primary driver behind the observed changes could be found in footprints that showed, for example, opposing responses in warm-water and cold-water species within a community; and similar responses from discrete populations at the same range edge.

Dr Pippa Moore, Lecturer in Aquatic Biology from Aberystwyth University, said: "Our research has shown that a wide range of marine organisms, which inhabit the intertidal to the deep-sea, and are found from the poles to the tropics, have responded to recent climate change by changing their distribution, phenology or demography.

"These results highlight the urgent need for governments around the globe to develop adaptive management plans to ensure the continued sustainability of the world's oceans and the goods and services they provide to human society."

Journal reference: Elvira S. Poloczanska, Christopher J. Brown, William J. Sydeman, Wolfgang Kiessling, David S. Schoeman, Pippa J. Moore, Keith Brander, John F. Bruno, Lauren B. Buckley, Michael T. Burrows, Carlos M. Duarte, Benjamin S. Halpern, Johnna Holding, Carrie V. Kappel, Mary I. O’Connor, John M. Pandolfi, Camille Parmesan, Franklin Schwing, Sarah Ann Thompson, Anthony J. Richardson. Global imprint of climate change on marine life. Nature Climate Change, 2013; DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1958

Aug 042013
 

 

Original story by Brian Williams, the Courier Mail

RECREATIONAL and commercial anglers will not know where to drop anchor to get their catch with new predictions climate change will impact on fish stocks.

Scientists have found that warming oceans are impacting on the breeding patterns and habitat of marine life, effectively rearranging the marine landscape as species shift towards cooler regions.

Dr Elvira Poloczanska: assessing the vulnerability of marine animals and habitats to climate change. Photo: CSIRO

Dr Elvira Poloczanska: assessing the vulnerability of marine animals and habitats to climate change. Photo: CSIRO

These include species such as coral trout, snapper and yellowtail kingfish.

Some recreational and commercial species are likely to decline, while others not previously in certain areas, could provide new fishing opportunities.

Researchers led by the CSIRO and University of Queensland marine ecologists Elvira Poloczanska and Anthony Richardson, have found that warming oceans are impacting on the breeding patterns and habitat of marine life.

They have recorded more than 1700 changes, including 222 in Australia, in a study published in the Nature Climate Change journal.

In 2010 Australian National Fish Collection curator Peter Last recorded Queensland groper, tiger sharks and even fish like coral trout as far south as Tasmania.

Dr Last found that yellowtail kingfish and snapper also had headed south, while north Queensland barramundi and threadfin salmon were being caught in Moreton Bay off Brisbane and on the Gold Coast.

Other fish on the move included temperate surf species such as silver drummer, rock blackfish and rock flathead and warm-water tuna and billfishes.

Dr Poloczanska said as water warmed, these species might be able to stay in southern parts over winter.

Marine species were shifting their geographic distribution towards cooler regions and doing so much faster than land-based counterparts.

Dr Anthony J Richardson: predicting impacts of climate change. Photo CSIRO

Dr Anthony J Richardson: predicting impacts of climate change. Photo CSIRO

Despite the ocean having absorbed 80 per cent of the heat added to the global climate system, the ocean's thermal capacity had led to surface waters warming three times more slowly than air temperatures on land.

"The leading edge or front line of a marine species distribution is moving towards the poles at the average rate of 72km per decade, which is considerably faster than terrestrial species moving pole-ward at an average of 6km per decade," Dr Poloczanska said.

Winter and spring temperatures were warming fastest.

In addition, anthropogenic carbon dioxide uptake by the oceans was altering seawater carbonate chemistry, which could impact on some marine organisms.

Associate Professor Richardson said although the study reported global impacts, there was strong evidence of change in the Australian marine environment.

Dr Poloczanska said subtropical species of fish, molluscs and plankton were shifting south through the Tasman Sea.

Dr Last found that a downside was that Tasmanian coastal species had nowhere to migrate to and were at risk of being wiped out.

The team included 19 researchers from Australia, USA, Canada, UK, Europe and South Africa.

Aug 042013
 

Original story by John McCarthy, the Courier Mail

Heavy metals leaching into waterways in the far north have caused environmental concerns. Picture: Michael Watt Source: News Limited

Heavy metals leaching into waterways in the far north have caused environmental concerns. Picture: Michael Watt Source: News Limited

HEAVY metals and arsenic have been found leaching into the Wild River, near Herberton, in what environmentalists are calling another example of a looming disaster.

The problem with the 15,000 abandoned mines in Queensland is now becoming so acute that flooding in central Queensland caused major pollution to nearby rivers, with some turning bright blue because of copper levels and others had high levels of acid.

In Herberton, water sampling of the Wild River found levels of arsenic and lead to be above the national drinking water standard. A handful of residents were found to be using water from the river for drinking and cooking, but Queensland Health considered the risks to be low.

However, the river has been declared a no-go zone and the State Government has increased its monitoring.

The Herberton site has been known about within Government for several years but the issue of arsenic and heavy metals was uncovered in ministerial briefing notes obtained by The Courier-Mail.

It follows the discovery recently that the State Government built welfare housing on land in Eidsvold that was heavily contaminated with arsenic from a nearby mine and researchers claim the problem would be the same in hundreds of mining towns around Australia.

Because arsenic is a carcinogen academics have been able to find a link between old mining towns in Victoria and levels of cancer.

Dr Dora Pearce, from Melbourne University, said the overall cancer risk for men and women living in areas with the highest soil arsenic level increased by 20 and 8 per cent respectively.

The old Mary Kathleen uranium mine in northwest Queensland has been leaking radioactive waste for decades, the Mount Morgan mine is considered one of the worst abandoned mines in Australia, the Lady Annie mine contaminated up to 52km of creek in the 2009 floods and contaminants from Mt Oxide, near Mount Isa, turned Cave Creek blue in the 2011 floods.

The Government has allocated $7.4 million to work on the abandoned mines this year.

Environmental engineer and senior lecturer at Monash University Gavin Mudd said during his visit to Herberton he found evidence of heavy metals everywhere.

''The State Government knows where all the abandoned mines are, but what has never been done is to understand the true impacts,'' he said.

''It's a much bigger problem than people realise.

''The industry and Government have got better but sometimes it doesn't work.

''For a lot of mines it may be small and to locals there's no huge health issue, but it still may be destroying the local environment.''

Environmentalists also point out that when the central Queensland coal mines end their life they will be left as huge voids, some as deep as 300 metres.

The Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry said the remoteness of some mines ''increased the chance that high levels of environmental damage are occurring without the department's knowledge''.

A Government spokeswoman said the abandoned mines unit was monitoring bores upstream and downstream of the Herberton tailings dam to provide a better understanding of how seepage could be minimised, and continued monitoring of downstream water use along the Wild River.

''Public safety is our number one priority with abandoned mine sites, and works are prioritised according to safety risks,'' she said.

The Queensland Resources Council and the Tablelands Regional Council would not comment on the issue.

Aug 042013
 

Original story by Graham Lloyd, The Australian

MINING, farm, indigenous and environmental groups are on a collision course in western Queensland following the Newman government's decision to scrap Labor's Wild Rivers Act and allow oil, coal-seam gas and shale gas exploration in the Channel Country.

The Queensland Resources Council said the decision had opened the door to a potentially "world-class" resource, but the farmers' lobby group AgForce said it wanted a moratorium on gas developments until there was a better understanding of the science and the industry's effect on water. Indigenous leaders called for more consultation, and environmental groups said the state government had "torn up a sensible compromise".

George Gorringe, left, with his son Scott Gorringe on the banks of Coopers Creek at Windora. George, a Traditional Owner for Mithaka country in Western Queensland, is concerned at the possible repeal of the Wild Rivers legislation over the Channel Country. Picture: Vanessa Hunter Source: TheAustralian

George Gorringe, left, with his son Scott Gorringe on the banks of Coopers Creek at Windora. George, a Traditional Owner for Mithaka country in Western Queensland, is concerned at the possible repeal of the Wild Rivers legislation over the Channel Country. Picture: Vanessa Hunter Source: TheAustralian

Bob Morrish, the natural resources delegate at a briefing by Queensland Mines Minister Andrew Cripps in Longreach yesterday, said there were few details of how the new system would work.

He said Mr Cripps "promised stringent controls but wouldn't tell us what they were".

Mr Cripps said the government had ruled out open-cut mining and capped water extraction on the Georgina and Diamantina rivers and Cooper Creek, but he opened the way for oil and gas developments in areas that had been out of bounds under wild rivers legislation.

The Channel Country is the world's largest unspoilt ephemeral waterway. Irregular floodwaters from northwest Queensland spread over kilometre-wide systems of channels to make their way slowly to Lake Eyre in central Australia.

Mr Cripps said oil and gas development would be strictly controlled in the Environmental Protection Act. "This will mean proposed petroleum and gas developments will be subject to stronger environmental conditioning than in any other part of Queensland," he said. "A special Channel Country protection area will be created (to) protect a greater area of riverine channels and floodplains than the existing wild rivers legislation."

Queensland Resources Council chief executive Michael Roche welcomed the decision, which he said had taken a "precautionary approach to future development of the Channel Country as a result of lengthy and transparent consultations with all stakeholders".

"This is a sensible improvement on the previous government's approach of declaring large swaths of Queensland off-limits to development to appease Brisbane-based environmental pressure groups," Mr Roche said.

Wilderness Society national campaign director Lyndon Schneiders said environment groups would campaign to maintain strict protections.

"The resource industry should be careful what they wish for. They have now clearly been responsible for stripping back high-level protection in a sensitive environment," he said.

"Environment groups have invested enormous time and effort with the local community to get sensible protection in that country. The mining industry must realise it has just torn up a sensible compromise."

AgForce senior policy adviser Dale Miller said farmers had been supportive of finding an alternative framework. However, there were concerns about the expansion of the unconventional gas industry. "Our position on CSG is for a moratorium in those regions until there is adequate scientific knowledge about the potential impacts," he said.

Australia's Chief Scientist, Ian Chubb, said policymakers needed to get regulations and policies in place "ahead of the game".

In an address to the National Press Club, he said: "We've just released recommendations of a report on shale gas, about six weeks ago, and one of the recommendations in that is that we get the policies and regulations in place before it becomes a problem."

Indigenous elder Gerry Fogarty, representing the Georgina and Diamantina catchment areas, said he was not satisfied enough people had been given a say on the proposed changes.