Jun 282013
 
Original story at Phys.org: Scientists discover thriving colonies of microbes in ocean 'plastisphere'

Scientists have discovered a diverse multitude of microbes colonizing and thriving on flecks of plastic that have polluted the oceans—a vast new human-made flotilla of microbial communities that they have dubbed the "plastisphere."

In a study recently published online in Environmental Science & Technology, the scientists say the plastisphere represents a novel ecological habitat in the ocean and raises a host of questions: How will it change environmental conditions for marine microbes, favoring some that compete with others? How will it change the overall ocean ecosystem and affect larger organisms? How will it change where microbes, including pathogens, will be transported in the ocean?

Suctorian ciliate covered with symbiotic bacteria, along with diatoms, and filaments on weathered and cracked microplastic debris. Credit: Erik Zettler, Sea Education Association

Suctorian ciliate covered with symbiotic bacteria, along with diatoms, and filaments on weathered and cracked microplastic debris. Credit: Erik Zettler, Sea Education Association

The collaborative team of scientists—Erik Zettler from Sea Education Association (SEA), Tracy Mincer from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), and Linda Amaral-Zettler from the Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL), all in Woods Hole, Mass.—analyzed marine plastic debris that was skimmed with fine-scale nets from the sea surface at several locations in the North Atlantic Ocean during SEA research cruises. Most were millimeter-sized fragments.

"We're not just interested in who's there. We're interested in their function, how they're functioning in this ecosystem, how they're altering this ecosystem, and what's the ultimate fate of these particles in the ocean," says Amaral-Zettler. "Are they sinking to the bottom of the ocean? Are they being ingested? If they're being ingested, what impact does that have?"

Using scanning electron microscopy and gene sequencing techniques, they found at least 1000 different types of bacterial cells on the plastic samples, including many individual species yet to be identified. They included plants, algae, and bacteria that manufacture their own food (autotrophs), animals and bacteria that feed on them (heterotrophs), predators that feed on these, and other organisms that establish synergistic relationships (symbionts). These complex communities exist on plastic bits hardly bigger than the head of a pin, and they have arisen with the explosion of plastics in the oceans in the last 60 years.

"The organisms inhabiting the plastisphere were different from those in surrounding seawater, indicating that plastic debris acts as artificial 'microbial reefs," says Mincer. "They supply a place that selects for and supports distinct microbes to settle and succeed."

These communities are likely different from those that settle on naturally occurring floating material such as feathers, wood, and microalgae, because plastics offer different conditions, including the capacity to last much longer without degrading.

On the other hand, the scientists also found evidence that microbes may play a role in degrading plastics. They saw microscopic cracks and pits in the plastic surfaces that they suspect were made by microbes embedded in them, as well as microbes possibly capable of degrading hydrocarbons.

"When we first saw the 'pit formers' we were very excited, especially when they showed up on multiple pieces of plastic of different types of resins," said Zettler, who added that undergraduate students participating in SEA Semester cruises collected and processed the samples. "Now we have to figure out what they are by [genetically] sequencing them and hopefully getting them into culture so we can do experiments."

The  also represents a new mode of transportation, acting as rafts that can convey harmful , including disease-causing pathogens and harmful algal species. One  sample they analyzed was dominated by members of the genus Vibrio, which includes bacteria that cause cholera and gastrointestinal maladies.

Jun 272013
 
Original story at Phys.org: Alarming new climate forecasts show why desal so vital for Australia's future

New climate forecasts warn of ten per cent streamflow losses into Melbourne's catchments and 25 per cent losses for South-West Western Australia.

The Climate Commission's new 2013 Critical Decade report, released this month, says many parts of , including Canberra, Melbourne, Perth and south-western  face adverse impacts from reduced rainfall.

The Commission warns that Canberra's water supply will soon be at risk. It is the only southern mainland capital not to have the insurance of a .

Sydney desalination plant in 2011. Photo: Sydney water

Sydney desalination plant in 2011. Photo: Sydney water

The 2013 report also says that  and availability will be the most critical determinant of future  in Australia.

Irrigated agriculture across the Murray-Darling Basin, for instance, faces a forecast 70 per cent decline in the decades ahead, WA wheat yields are projected to decline by 30 per cent and Queensland  will also be adversely impacted.

The new forecasts in the full report online can be found here.

Murdoch University-based National Centre of Excellence in  Australia (NCEDA) CEO Neil Palmer says the alarming report shows just how vital desalination is for Australia's future.

"Planners and policymakers can no longer afford to avoid these adverse forecasts and need to accept that desalination is necessary insurance for Australia's ," Mr Palmer said.

"While the six major seawater desalination plants built along our coastline have effectively drought-proofed cities for now, these new forecasts, together with anticipated population growth and increasing demand mean that Australia needs to commit long term to the increased use of desalination to secure its freshwater supplies."

Mr Palmer says desalination is the only new and sustainable source of freshwater available. Even during Queensland's recent floods, the state's desalination plant proved invaluable for maintaining water supplies while other sources were swamped.

Mr Palmer says Perth and the South-West of WA in particular face an increasing shortfall in the long term. This is despite the state's two seawater desalination plants operating at full production and a new desalination plant for water recycling at Beenyup coming online in the next few years.

"Successful new initiatives such as Sundrop Farms in South Australia are also showing how seawater desalination powered by solar energy can produce sustainable food in dry climates.

"Sundrop is planning to build a new 20-hectare greenhouse for horticultural production, and is a fantastic example of how Australian agriculture can benefit from the smart use of desal technology."

NCEDA, based at Murdoch's Rockingham campus, is currently funding CSIRO research investigating and mapping the practical application of desalination in agriculture around the country.

NCEDA is also funding research examining the long-term economic benefits of water security brought about by seawater desalination as an integral part of the urban water supply mix.

Funded by a $20 million investment from the Australian Government's "Water for the Future" initiative, the internationally significant research and development centre drives scientific endeavours helping to drought-proof the arid nation and deliver new economic benefits.

In addition, more than $39 million in supporting cash and in-kind co-investment has so far been leveraged from the Australian Government's initial investment from the Centre's 14 Participating Organisations and over 90 state government, water utility and industry partners.

 

Jun 262013
 

Original story at The NewsPort

Michael RocheChief Executive of the Queensland Resources Council, speaks out on the Great Barrier Reef debate.

Federal Environment Minister Tony Burke’s dissection of the debate surrounding the future for communities along 80 percent of the Queensland coastline is welcome acknowledgement of what residents have known for a long time.

The Great Barrier Reef. PHOTO WWF

The Great Barrier Reef. PHOTO WWF

As reported, Minister Burke says there are two Great Barrier Reef campaigns – one a genuine effort to make sure the values of the iconic World Heritage Area are preserved and a second to shut down Queensland’s coal and gas industries.

Queensland’s leading export industries are minerals, energy, food, fibre and tourism. Together they contribute around $40 billion a year to the economy. What’s that mean? That’s about 10 times what has been committed by any Australian Government to upgrade the Bruce Highway and just shy of total revenues collected last year by the Queensland Government.

Along with the operators of the 11 commercial ports incorporated into the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area 32 years ago, these industries have co-existed with the reef under the scrutiny of state, federal and international environmental agencies. In hindsight, their inclusion in the World Heritage Area in 1981 was a masterstroke in placing an enduring focus on ecologically sustainable development.

Reef-based industries know they will be judged harshly if they do not have the highest levels of environmental protection in their planning and operations. It is this reality that continues to drive positive changes to fishing, agriculture, tourism and port practices.

Almost 80 percent of Queensland’s exports are now traded through the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area ports of Gladstone, Rockhampton, Hay Point, Mackay, Abbot Point, Townsville, Lucinda, Mourilyan, Cairns, Cape Flattery and Quintell Beach. These ports are also lifelines for almost one million Queenslanders for imports including oil, general cargo and tourist shipping.

Shipping movements in the Great Barrier Reef are the most closely monitored in the world. Thanks to expanded monitoring and sophisticated technology, the number of shipping incidents has fallen from one per year to less than one per decade while the rate of shipping has grown incrementally.

Technology enhancements keep pace with traffic, just as they do at international airports. Queensland has a vested interest in ensuring that the past 32 years of managed interaction between the Great Barrier Reef and adjoining industries and communities thrives.

Queensland’s exports are now traded through the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area ports, including Gladstone. PHOTO Coastal Care

Queensland’s exports are now traded through the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area ports, including Gladstone. PHOTO Coastal Care

The only people campaigning to see the Great Barrier Reef declared ‘in danger’ by UNESCO are environmental activists – largely funded by international groups such as Greenpeace.

Their goal is to shut Queensland’s export coal and gas industries down at the same time Asia is trying to lift billions of people out of the energy poverty trap and modernise. Activist scaremongering over proposed port dredging and shipping deliberately ignores the scientific documentation of cyclones, Crown of Thorns starfish invasions, coastal run-off and the impacts of climate change as major threats.

At 348,000 square kilometres and bigger than the UK, Holland and Switzerland combined, the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area’s ecologically sustainable development is a challenge that Australians have accepted since the reef’s declaration as a Marine Park in 1975. Over those almost 40 years, scientifically informed and carefully managed outcomes have served the reef and Queensland communities well.

The future demands renewed commitments to continuous improvements in environmental stewardship.

It does not mean the sacrifice of one global value for another to appease activists with the attention span of an election campaign.

Jun 262013
 

Original story By Matthew Backhouse, New Zealand Herald

A transtasman court case against Japan's whaling programme begins in The Hague today.

Australia initiated proceedings in the International Court of Justice in 2010, alleging Japan has been carrying out commercial whaling under the guise of its scientific whaling programme.

A whale being dragged on board a Japanese ship after being harpooned in Antarctic waters. Photo / AFP

A whale being dragged on board a Japanese ship after being harpooned in Antarctic waters. Photo / AFP

It alleges that is in breach of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling and other international obligations to preserve marine mammals and the ocean environment.

Australian lawyers will present their opening arguments before the court today, followed by Japan's lawyers next week.

New Zealand applied to intervene in the case in November last year. As an intervening party, New Zealand will also have the chance to present oral arguments against Japan's whaling programme.

Attorney-General Chris Finlayson will make a 90-minute submission to the court on July 8. He will travel to The Hague on Sunday to hear Japan's submissions before putting forward New Zealand's case.

Foreign Minister Murray McCully earlier said he was pleased New Zealand was able to put its views on the proper interpretation of the Whaling Convention before the court.

"As a member of the International Whaling Commission, New Zealand has an interest in ensuring that the IWC works effectively and that the Whaling Convention is properly interpreted and applied.

"New Zealand will continue to work to end whaling in the Southern Ocean."

The case is set down for three weeks, with a second round of oral arguments from Australia and Japan set to follow New Zealand's submission.

Jun 252013
 

Original story by Laura Glitsos, ScienceNetwork Western Australia

THE WA Department of Fisheries is reporting positive outcomes from the incorporation of new DNA-based monitoring technology to protect and manage our aquatic ecosystems.

Dr Snow says applying real-time polymerase chain reaction can help identify microscopic forms of these pests in water samples so that we can detect their arrival at a very early stage. Image: Cory Doctorow

Dr Snow says applying real-time polymerase chain reaction can help identify microscopic forms of these pests in water samples so that we can detect their arrival at a very early stage. Image: Cory Doctorow

WA DoF supervising research scientist Dr Mike Snow says the application of methods such as real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA barcoding is changing the nature of monitoring and conservation.

DNA barcoding has already been incorporated for the rapid detection and identification of the Asian green mussel, a harmful marine pest which can have significant economic, environmental and even human health issues.

“One of the problems is that we often have to rely on expert taxonomists for identification of a particular species, which may sometimes not even be available in Australia as taxonomy is a traditional skill that is difficult to access these days,” Dr Snow says.

“And it can be particularly difficult to identify some pests like mussels or sea squirts from closely related species that are native to our waters.”

“But with DNA barcoding we can now rapidly identify and confirm these agents and we can take appropriate action, for example, we can turn a vessel around or clean a vessel in a much more efficient way.”

DNA barcoding uses a very short genetic sequence, or marker, from a standard part of the genome, in much the same way as a supermarket scanner distinguishes products using the black stripes of the Universal Product Code.

In addition, Dr Snow says applying real-time PCR can help identify microscopic forms of these pests in water samples so that we can detect their arrival at a very early stage and monitor for their spread.

It can also indicate the quantity of a specific pest in a sample.

This technology is based on amplifying a highly specific region of a pest organism’s DNA millions of times, with its positive amplification generating fluorescent light that can be detected by a laser in real-time.

“It is currently performed in a lab, but maybe one day will be able to be performed on site,” Dr Snow says.

He says that the application of these technologies has been so far very successful, and a scientific paper compiled by the DoF research team is in the process of publication.

Dr Snow says the next step will be building on the concept of “environmental DNA” or eDNA.

This method uses the latest ‘next generation sequencing’ technology to simultaneously identify the barcodes of up to millions of organisms in a sample.

It has shown great promise in identifying species based on the minute traces of DNA shed into the water column by all the animals living in it.

“It’s currently being explored for its practicality for detecting the range of pest or native fish species present in freshwater lakes, and it may be far more efficient than traditional trapping.”

Jun 252013
 

Original story at Hunter-Central Rivers Catchment Management Authority

The dedication and hard work of staff from various government agencies to restore tidal connectivity to the Tomago Wetlands on the Hunter River has been recognised with a National Trust Heritage Award.

Clear skies at a recent bird survey in the wetlands

Clear skies at a recent bird survey in the wetlands

Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project Manager, Peggy Svoboda, was pleased that the restoration picked up the Conservation Natural Heritage Award.

‘It’s well deserved given the impressive transformation I’ve seen in the wetlands’, Ms Svoboda explained.

‘During this month’s survey with the Hunter Bird Observers Club one member of the team reminisced about how dry it had been prior to tidal flows being restored.’

‘Now gum boots are compulsory at Tomago Wetlands.’

Twenty years of work culminated in the recent managed opening of the Tomago floodgates by National Parks and Wildlife Service and has resulted in a spectacular restoration of the part of Tomago Wetlands that lie within Hunter Wetlands National Park.

Hunter Bird Observers Club member Ann Lindsey said she is happy to have been given the chance to witness the transformation of a barren, weed-ridden grassland to a fabulous wetland full of life.

‘Thousands of ducks have returned to roost on the saltmarsh islands or feed in the open waters’, Ms Lindsey explained during the survey.

‘Migratory shorebirds, most of them threatened species, find a safe place to spend the summer months again and our own resident shorebirds feed happily in the muddy water the year round.’

‘As I watch this scene I feel immensely satisfied, but also I am constantly amazed at how our birdlife has bounced back so quickly when given the conditions for their survival.’

Ms Svoboda explained that there are significant areas of the original restoration plan for Tomago Wetlands that lie adjacent to the national park site.

‘When these are restored, they will greatly add to the valuable work completed to date and continue to help redress loss of key habitat elsewhere in the estuary.’

The effort at Tomago Wetlands was initiated in 1993 through the CMA's Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project (KWRP) which brought together State Government natural resource management agencies, local councils, industries and community groups, who formed a shared vision of ecological restoration.

Funding for the restoration was provided by the Recreational Fishing Trust, the Federal Government’s Caring for our Country Program, Hunter-Central Rivers Catchment Management Authority and the Office of Environment and Heritage’s Parks and Wildlife Division.

Researchers from University of NSW’s Water Research Laboratory were also involved. Ongoing monthly bird surveys are conducted by the Hunter Bird Observers Club.

For more information on the Tomago Wetland Rehabilitation Project visit the Water Research Laboratory website -
http://www.wrl.unsw.edu.au/site/projects/tidal-restoration-and-wetland-creation-at-the-kooragang-nature-reserve-tomago-nsw/

Jun 252013
 

By Gilad BinoKim JenkinsRichard Kingsford (National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility (NCCARF)) at Australian PolicyOnline

The Macquarie Marshes are one of Australia’s iconic wetlands, recognised for their international importance, providing habitat for some of the continent’s more important waterbird breeding sites as well as complex and extensive flood-dependent vegetation communities. Part of the area is recognised as a wetland of international importance, under the Ramsar Convention. River regulation has affected their resilience, which may increase with climate change. Counteracting these impacts, the increased amount of environmental flow provided to the wetland through the buy-back and increased wildlife allocation have redressed some of the impacts of river regulation.

© Richard Kingsford

© Richard Kingsford

This project assists in the development of an adaptive management framework for this Ramsar-listed wetland. It brings together current management and available science to provide an informed hierarchy of objectives that incorporates climate change adaptation and assists transparent management. The project adopts a generic approach allowing the framework to be transferred to other wetlands, including Ramsar-listed wetlands, supplied by rivers ranging from highly regulated to free flowing.

The integration of management with science allows key indicators to be monitored that will inform management and promote increasingly informed decisions. The project involved a multi-disciplinary team of scientists and managers working on one of the more difficult challenges for Australia, exacerbated by increasing impacts of climate change on flows and inundation patterns.

Please cite report as:

Bino, G, Jenkins, K, Kingsford, R, 2013 Adaptive management of Ramsar wetlands, National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast, pp 244.

Jun 242013
 

WetlandCare AustraliaOriginal story by Louise Duff and Fran Beilby, WetlandCare Australia

Porters Creek Wetland is the largest remaining freshwater wetland on the Central Coast of New South Wales. It plays a critical role filtering and purifying water on its way to the Wyong River, which supplies drinking water for the local community. The river flows into Tuggerah Lakes, a connected series of three shallow, estuarine lagoons open to the sea at The Entrance. Together these waterways provide habitat for a diversity of flora and fauna, support fishing and tourism enterprise and offer outstanding recreational opportunities for the Wyong community.

Students conducted a biodiversity audit of their school grounds using a plant identification key. Photo: Louise Duff

Students conducted a biodiversity audit of their school grounds using a plant identification key. Photo: Louise Duff

WetlandCare Australia (WCA) is a national not-for-profit company that has been working with communities to protect, restore and promote wetlands since 1991. We were invited by Wyong Shire Council to engage primary students at three schools bordering Porters Creek Wetland, to complement a broader program of work to protect Tuggerah Lakes Estuary. The program was funded by the Australian Government’s “Caring For Our Country” Program and the theme was “Love Our Living Lakes.”

WCA designed and implemented an environmental education program called “Catchment Custodians” to meet Wyong Council’s brief. The program targeted Year 5 students, Environment Clubs, the wider school community and neighbours in the catchment including industry.

The program aimed to promote understanding and appreciation of wetland values and threats, responsible behaviours to protect the catchment, a sense of place and active citizenship.

In Term 1, students studied wetland biodiversity, ecosystem services, threats and management in both formal classroom and outdoor settings.

In Term 2 they developed and delivered a community outreach program which took their message of wetland protection to the streets. Students worked in groups to write and illustrate a brochure and delivered it to neighbouring houses on the edge of the wetland. They undertook drain stenciling to spread the message “only rain down the drain.” One group developed and presented a PowerPoint training module to staff at Carlton United’s Bluetongue Brewery, then was shown the brewery’s stormwater management controls. Another group staged the Streets to Creeks” Catchment Story for the school-readiness group at a childcare centre adjacent to the wetland.

In Term 3, a wider group of nearly 200 students participated in a Catchment Carnival with experiential learning activities presented by local stakeholders including the National Parks and Wildlife Service, Hunter-Central Rivers CMA and the Central Coast Community Environment Network. Darkinjung elder Gavi Duncan performed an inspiring “Welcome to Country” and enthralled the students with stories, dancing and artifacts.

The program concluded with Junior Landcare and Waterwatch activities to build practical skills for wetland conservation. Students planted habitat trees on campus and at Tumbi Umbi wetlands in partnership with the local Landcare group.

Students tracked their progress in a Catchment Custodian passport throughout the program and were presented certificates recognizing their status as Catchment Custodians. The results were documented and presented via a series of digital stories that can be found on WetlandCare Australia’s YouTube channel:http://www.youtube.com/user/WetlandCareAust?feature=guide

Further information about Wong Shire Council’s “Love Our Living Lakes” program can be found at:http://www.loveourlivinglakes.com.au/

Contact:

Louise Duff

Manager Hunter Region

WetlandCare Australia

M: 0432 688775

E: louiseduff@wetlandcare.com.au

Jun 242013
 

Original story by Marty McCarthy, ABC Rural

An advisor to the World Heritage Committee says it wants more information from Australian authorities about plans to expand ports along the Great Barrier Reef.

NASA satellite photograph of the Great Barrier Reef between Rockhampton and Mackay. Image: NASA

NASA satellite photograph of the Great Barrier Reef between Rockhampton and Mackay. Image: NASA

Last week, the committee decided it would delay a final judgement on declaring the reef 'in danger' until next year.

Program specialist for the World Heritage Centre, Marc Patry, says the decision was based on recent commitments by Australian federal and state governments to improve water quality.

"The latest report card on water quality was positive,” he said.

"We noted good progress on water quality and investment that ensures there's fewer sediment, fertiliser and pesticide run-off into the water.”

But Mr Patry says more scrutiny of port developments is needed before a final verdict can be made next year.

"There's still work to be doing in terms of making clear statements and commitments in terms of the nature and extent of port developments along the coast," he said.

"The reason the decision of the World Heritage Committee calls for consideration next year perhaps for 'in danger' listing is because we're not yet clear on where things will fall in terms of port developments.

"If they fall on the wrong side, then this could be a major concern."

Mr Patry says the committee would prefer to see fewer port developments along the Great Barrier Reef, but that a danger listing isn’t necessarily a bad outcome.

"A couple of years ago, the United States came to us requesting the Everglades be put on the danger list,” he said.

"It was a proactive move on their part.

“It's not uncommon that governments approach the World Heritage Committee.”

Mr Patry says if the Australian Government requests the Barrier Reef be put on the danger list, the World Heritage Committee would consider it.

"We certainly have no objections to that," he said.

"Because we feel it's the best way to bring in the necessary political support at different levels.

"People tend to be afraid of the danger listing, they consider it a black mark or a punishment.

“Having said that it's preferable not to get on he danger list.

“But if the situation requires it, then why not make use of this very practical tool?"

Jun 242013
 

WetlandCare AustraliaOriginal story at WetlandCare Australia: Delivering Biodiversity Dividends for the Barratta Creek Catchment

WetlandCare Australia, with support through funding from the Australian Government’s Clean Energy Future Biodiversity Fund, will protect, manage and enhance the high ecological functional values of the Barratta Creek Catchment which forms the main artery of the Bowling Green Bay wetlands, the only Ramsar site in north Queensland.

Wetlands on agricultural farms are an intergral part of sustainable land management in the Barrattas. Photo: WetlandCare Australia

Wetlands on agricultural farms are an intergral part of sustainable land management in the Barrattas. Photo: WetlandCare Australia

 

Barratta Creek is one of the most high integrity floodplain creek systems on the developed east coast of Queensland. Since the introduction of intensive irrigated agriculture the creek and wetlands have suffered serious impacts through a lack of active management and understanding including invasive aquatic and terrestrial weeds, hot frequent fires regimes and excessive and nutrient rich tailwater flows.WetlandCare Australia will unite multiple stakeholders to improve biodiversity outcomes in the Barratta Creek catchment and internationally listed Ramsar wetlands through integrated catchment based management.