Aug 132013
 

Birdsville croc wins a free trip to DreamworldOriginal story by Chrissy Arthur, ABC News

A croc catcher is due in south-western Queensland this morning in an effort to move the freshwater crocodile living at Birdsville.

For several months, the crocodile has been living in a waterhole in the Diamantina River at Birdsville, up to 1,000 kilometres away from its usual habitat.

The freshwater crocodile is being removed from the Diamantina River near Birdsville and taken to Dreamworld. Photo: Sandra McShane via ABC News

The freshwater crocodile is being removed from the Diamantina River near Birdsville and taken to Dreamworld. Photo: Sandra McShane via ABC News

It was first spotted by a tourist.

The Diamantina Shire Council says it has been working with the Queensland Environment Department on ways to move the reptile.

Al Mucci from the Dreamworld theme park says the croc will be taken back to the Gold Coast.

"We would house it while expressions of interest go out to the broader community, the broader zoo industry," he said.

"The animal may not end up at Dreamworld but we will find a home for it."

Happy outcome

Diamantina Mayor Geoff Morton says while Birdsville will lose a talking point, relocating it is the best option for residents and the crocodile.

"Birdsville will lose a conversation point that's for sure," he said.

"If you'd have told me even 12 months ago we were going to have one in the river, I would have wondered what you'd been drinking.

"It was our primary intention to humanely relocate it.

"It's a win for everybody - it's a win for the community, they've got exactly what they want.

"It's a win for the crocodile - he is going to be looked after, probably better than he has been in his tiny shallow waterhole for the last couple of months."

Aug 112013
 

Original story by Sunshine Coast Daily

PETRIE Creek has become a "trolley graveyard" for almost 50 metal frames, rusting in the Nambour waterway.
Discarded shopping trolleys polluting waterways.

Discarded shopping trolleys polluting waterways.

Fran McDiarmid lives beside Petrie Creek and was "appalled" at the pollution building up in and around the creek.

She counted at least 18items of hard rubbish, most being discarded shopping trolleys.

"That's what's on the surface, who knows what's underneath," she said.

"It was horrendous, if nothing's done now it will build up and be a tsunami of trolleys.

"Petrie Creek was the original name for the now known town of Nambour.

"I am astonished that this living organic and iconic symbol, and an environmental site of history and culture, can be blatantly disregarded, and thus neglected, for so long."

Petrie Creek Catchment Care Group president Norm Morwood said dumping shopping trolleys in the creek had been a problem for many years.

"Clearing them from the creek is a constant job and each year at Clean Up Australia Day.

"Many are found and removed," he said.

"If left in the creek they cause serious pollution and are a danger to the wildlife.

"We urge those who put them there to return them to the supermarkets instead, and we urge Woolworths to install control systems on their trolleys to help overcome this problem.

"We understand that Aldi will install deposit-controlled shopping trolleys and that Coles will have an electronic control system.

"If this is so we thank them for their assistance in overcoming this problem."

A Sunshine Coast Council spokesman said on Wednesday and Thursday last week, they retrieved 26 trolleys and identified about 20 more to be picked up.

The spokesman said that under local laws, a person could be issued a $220 on-the-spot fine for taking a shopping trolley from a shopping centre precinct or leaving a trolley outside the shopping centre precinct.

"The owner or occupier of a shop which provides shopping trolleys for customers must ensure that all shopping trolleys so provided remain in the shopping centre precinct," he said.

Aug 112013
 

Original story by Julie Power, Sydney Morning Herald

Elaine Davies is a reluctant and unusual eco warrior. But to the City of Sydney she is the very model of a modern eco hero.

Sanctuary - green and golden bellfrogs have been living at the Davies' Rosebery property for 30 years.

Sanctuary - green and golden bellfrogs (Litoria aurea) have been living at the Davies' Rosebery property for 30 years.

The Davies family's above-ground backyard pool in suburban Rosebery has been the difference between life and death for the threatened green and golden bell frog, according to a flora and fauna survey by the council.

''We didn't even realise what they were,'' Mrs Davies said. The frogs took up residence 30 years ago in the pool that her husband had refused to dismantle despite her nagging.

''We were sitting out the back and suddenly we realised that we were being observed by frogs, these very pretty green and gold frogs,'' said Mrs Davies, who is in her late 70s.

The city has identified 63 native birds, eight mammals, 11 reptiles and five frog species plus many plants and trees, many of which were thought to have died out altogether in the inner-city area alone.

As well as the green and golden bell frog, other threatened species living between the high-rises and the highways included the powerful owl, the grey-headed flying fox, and the long-nosed bandicoot. Some venomous red-bellied black snakes were found near the Glebe light rail stop.

''To find we have naturally occurring native plants and animals in such a disturbed environment is pretty incredible,'' said Joel Johnson, the manager of parks, trees and aquatic facilities with City of Sydney.

''And the numbers we found were incredible,'' he said.

''There are 365 native plant species, and 87 native animals.''

The city has allocated $14 million over five years to its Urban Ecology Strategic Action Plan to expand these animals' habitats and restore areas where indigenous plant species were found. That would include workshops on how to create natural habitats, and offer matching grants for community groups, neighbours and schools that provided the labour.

It would also include a website where the public could record sightings, and upload photos.

Mr Johnson cited Sydney Park in St Peters as an example of what could be done. "It was was once a landfill, and now it is a fabulous wetland system with freshwater wading birds that visit every year, and resident birds.''

Lord mayor Clover Moore said every citizen had a role to play in protecting this ''amazing wildlife, before it's gone forever".

While most people focused on animal sightings, the city discovered many species of plants in the area such as saltbush and mangroves in Rozelle Bay that were thought to have disappeared.

In Glebe, volunteers had restored the population of the endangered Superb fairy-wren by planting mixed height shrubs, including prickly and thorny plants, that protect them from larger predators.

Mrs Davies said she did little to preserve the frogs.

''They came of their own volition, they'll probably go on their own volition, too,'' she said.

She was saddened to see that frog numbers were down, and her pond had started attracting marsh frogs.

While the green and golden bell frogs had a beautiful call, the marsh frog sounded like a metronome. ''It is not a call, it is just a sound,'' she said dismissively.

Aug 102013
 

Original story by Rogini MoorthiScienceNetwork Western Australia

WA CONSERVATION organisations have undertaken the first translocation of native water rats in Australia, with the goal of returning the species to areas within their former range.

Dr Rafferty says water rats are key indicators of a healthy wetland system, and if they are struggling to obtain a plentiful supply of their primary food source (invertebrates and fishes), chances are that there is a change in water quality. Photo: Perth Zoo

Dr Rafferty says water rats are key indicators of a healthy wetland system, and if they are struggling to obtain a plentiful supply of their primary food source (invertebrates and fishes), chances are that there is a change in water quality. Photo: Perth Zoo

Australia’s largest native rodents, the water rats (Hydromys chysogaster)  were once common throughout Western Australia but are now considered to be extinct in some regions.

The reintroduction project by the Australian Wildlife Conservancy (AWC), Whiteman Park and Perth Zooaims to re-establish secure populations of the animal on the Swan Coastal Plain and across the Darling Scarp, in the long-term.

As part of conservation efforts, a group of native water rats were translocated from Perth Zoo to the islands of Mussel Pool based at Whiteman Park and AWC’s Karakamia Wildlife Sanctuary in Chidlow.

Whiteman Park’s land and environment team leader Christine Rafferty says while native rats were historically part of the wetland ecosystem in Mussel Pool, they have become quite rare within the region because of an increase in predation and habitat loss.

“But, now that the land is being cared for, we believe that new populations of these animals can be reestablished,” says Dr Rafferty.

“The reintroduction of water rats can work towards increasing local biodiversity of our parkland.”

There are currently two water rats – one male and one female – at the park, whose movements are being monitored by cameras located near the Mussel Pool area.

Dr Rafferty says water rats are key indicators of a healthy wetland system, and if they are struggling to obtain a plentiful supply of their primary food source (invertebrates and fishes), chances are that there is a change in water quality.

“We would like to monitor the animals into the summer months before implementing any further translocations, as it is during this time that the water temperature starts heating up and implications of the changes in water quality on the rat can be observed.”

Meanwhile, AWC’s Chief Executive Mr Atticus Fleming says, the reintroduction of the three water rats – one male and two females – in Karakamia can help restore the food web, which currently lacks these aquatic predators.

“Comprising of both natural riparian habitats and a dam that creates a permanent water body, the wildlife sanctuary provides an ideal habitat for these animals,” says Mr Fleming.

“As Karakamia also has vermin-proof fences surrounding the property, it keeps out feral predators such as fox and cats that can threaten the success of any translocation of these animals.”

The three water rats will be closely monitored, and if the reintroduction is a success, Karakamia is likely to get another female and male rat.

Aug 102013
 

ABC NewsOriginal story ABC News

A crucial koala habitat in the Hunter is set to be rehabilitated with a $100,000 [NSW] State Government grant.

Koala habitat to be rehabilitated. Photo: Australia Zoo Wildlife Hospital

Koala habitat to be rehabilitated. Photo: Australia Zoo Wildlife Hospital

Wetland Care Australia will rehabilitate 40 hectares of forest near the Hunter estuary, which is part of the Hunter Region Botanic Gardens.

The project will also benefit a number of threatened species including the Grey Headed Flying Fox and the Swift Parrot.

Port Stephens MP Craig Baumann says the area is part of the Tomago, Stockton, Tomaree sand beds and connects with surrounding bushland allowing the movement of fauna.

"There is a dense blanket of lantana in this particular 40 hectare site and that is inhibiting other trees and of course those other trees is what the koala needs for food," he said.

"This is an extension of that and will try to turn it back into pristine wilderness."

Aug 092013
 

Original story by AAP at news.com.au

GREEN turtles are swallowing plastic at twice the rate they did 25 years ago, according to a new study.

The finding is based on data collected across the globe since the late 1980s and analysed by researchers at the University of Queensland.

Green turtles are swallowing plastic at twice the rate they did 25 years ago, a new study shows.

Green turtles are swallowing plastic at twice the rate they did 25 years ago, a new study shows.

Study leader and PhD candidate Qamar Schuyler says green and leatherback turtles are eating more plastic than ever before and more than any other form of debris.

The ages of turtles and their habitats are also factors.

"Our research revealed that young ocean-going turtles were more likely to eat plastic than their older, coastal-dwelling relatives," Ms Schuyler said on Friday.

Amazingly, stranded turtles found adjacent to heavily populated New York City showed little or no evidence of debris ingestion.

But all stranded turtles found near an undeveloped area of southern Brazil had eaten debris, Ms Schuyler said.

"This means conducting coastal clean-ups is not the single answer to the problem of debris ingestion for local sea turtle populations."

But she said it was an important step in preventing marine debris input into the ocean.

Ms Schuyler said an estimated 80 per cent of debris comes from land-based sources.

That fact showed how critical it was to manage man-made debris at every point, from its manufacture to the point of a product's consumption.

Aug 082013
 

Helping an iconic Australian treeOriginal story by Kylie Williams, ABC Environment

The yellow box gum tree is a beautiful Australian tree famed for its delicious honey. But with much of its habitat destroyed, the race is on to protect and expand the last remaining stands.

STANDING IN A SEA of waving grass stands an ancient yellow box gum tree. Its scruffy brown bark catches the dying rays of the sun as bees grab their last sips from the fuzzy flowers before heading back to the hive for the night.

Lone paddock trees like this are an Australian icon and a visible reminder of the vegetation Australia has lost to farming and land clearing over the last two hundred years.

The flowers of Eucalyptus melliodora are a source of a much loved variety of honey. Photo: Flagstaffotos

The flowers of Eucalyptus melliodora are a source of a much loved variety of honey. Photo: Flagstaffotos

Mighty yellow box gums (Eucalyptus melliodora - meaning honey scented) once stood proudly alongside Blakely's red gum and white box in grassy woodlands that covered close to 20 times the area they cling to today. The remnant stands provide an essential habitat for endangered bird species - such as the critically endangered regent honeyeater, brown treecreeper and the superb parrot - and pollen for bees producing Australia's popular yellow box honey.

So rare have these last clusters of trees become, that the last patches of yellow box are now recognised as critically endangered and protected under both Commonwealth (EPBC Act) and state legislation.

But help may be at hand. Dr Linda Broadhurst leads a unique, community-powered science project that is helping to restore the yellow box.

"Several generations of farmers have grown up with these paddock trees. In two to three generations, the trees will be gone - unless we do something about it," explains Dr Broadhurst, a CSIRO conservation biologist.

"We've got an ageing cohort of eucalypts in our agricultural landscape that we need to think about replacing as quickly as possible."

However, tree restoration is not straightforward. Scientists say it is vital for such projects to source seed from suitable trees that are not too closely related. Poor-quality eucalyptus seed produced through inbreeding can be less fit than wild seeds, or may not have the resilience to respond to changes in their environment.

Dr Broadhurst has gathered about 80 volunteer researchers from across the community to help her assess the genetic health of the critically endangered yellow box by collecting seed samples for genetic analysis.

"People love yellow box," she says. "We put out a call on CSIRO social media channels and through the Greening Australia Capital Region and the response was very positive. From there, it flowed to various community groups and beekeeping organisations in Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland."

Honey, honey

Beekeepers know that the few remaining yellow box trees that still dot the south-eastern Australian agricultural landscape - from which their bees derive this well-known and loved honey variety - are not faring well.

Beekeeper Leo Kuter is one of the volunteers who put up his hand to help the yellow box research project by collecting samples from near his hives on the property of Stewart Scott, a dryland, mixed-enterprise farmer from near Deniliquin, New South Wales.

Armed with a GPS, pruning shears and an esky, the two friends collected leaves, gumnuts and a herbarium sample - together with information about the site and the health of the yellow box population growing nearby - as per the instructions included in the project collection kit.

"The yellow box trees I collected from are all 200 to 300 years old," says Kuter. "They are the last of the big trees not chopped down in the 1900s to clear the way for weirs on the Murray."

Native forests are the most important resource for beekeepers, explains Ararat beekeeper, Judy Leggett, another volunteer participating in the CSIRO/Greening Australia project.

"Australia's eucalypts in particular are good sources of honey and help give the honey its distinctive taste and density," explains Leggett, who is also secretary of the Central Victorian Apiarists Association.

"As a beekeeping tree, yellow box is very good for honey production," she says. "It's interesting to see if the trees have all come from a similar genetic background, or whether the ones down here in Victoria as opposed to New South Wales are very different."

Value for farmers

Many of Broadhurst's volunteers are farmers who recognise the value of the old gums scattered around their family's property.

Paddock trees play a very important role during periods of high stress for stock, such as the longer, hotter summers experienced in south-eastern Australia in recent years. They provide shade and shelter for stock in extreme weather.

Stewart Scott, whose yellow box trees were surveyed in the project says , "I've cleared a lot of country, but we've still kept belts of timber." He agrees that "stock do a lot better with timber".

Scattered trees with enormous, deep roots can also draw down water to help keep salinity at bay. Further, their root systems - and associated insects and microbes - recycle nutrients, helping regulate soil acidity and maintain soil friability.

Despite these benefits to stock and soil, paddock trees may literally stand in the way of progress. With a shift in farming practice toward larger farms and automated farming equipment, the trees can upset the straight paths that tractor and harvester engineers might prefer and tree roots can damage farming machinery.

"The big challenge for us at the moment is how we can help farmers grow these trees in a production landscape, and still keep their production high," explains Broadhurst.

Recent studies have also shown that paddock trees may be important 'stepping stones' for bird species moving in response to changing climate patterns. Like frogs hopping between lily pads, birds can fly between paddock trees, small revegetation patches and roadside verges with trees to reach safe havens as they move away from increasingly hostile habitats.

"Yellow box is crucial to the long-term survival of regent honeyeaters," says Dean Ingwersen, who is regent honeyeater recovery coordinator with Birdlife Australia.

Ingwersen and his team are working to restore and preserve precious bird habitat across Tasmania, Victoria and New South Wales. They recognise the importance of new knowledge in managing the natural environment, especially of studies such as Broadhurst's.

"If a species like yellow box is indeed suffering from inbreeding, we need to understand what this does to things like recruitment and rehabilitation, as well as what happens to aspects of their ecology, like timing of flowering and nectar flow," Ingwersen says.

As a conservationist, Broadhurst hope the project will allow more of the trees to be given space in agricultural areas, and for more farmers to appreciate the benefits of paddock trees.

"It's not too late. We've got a really good opportunity to do something about it. We've got to make sure we help farmers keep their landscapes productive, but also keep native vegetation. It's not an either/or situation - its win-win for biodiversity and production."

Aug 082013
 
Original story http://www.invasives.org.auNational Survey Results Reveal Invasive Species Rank as Greatest Threat to Australia's Native Plants and Animals

Percentage of respondents rating threat's to Australia's native plants and animals as 'high' or 'very high'

Which issues are you tackling?

A national survey of conservation, government and landcare groups in Australia has revealed that weeds, invasive animals, and 'all invasive species' rank just above habitat loss as the greatest threats to the country’s native plants and animals.

The survey was carried out over eight weeks across a wide range of conservation, government and Landcare groups, asking respondents to rank threats ‘putting at risk the conservation of Australia’s native plants and animals’.

It was aimed at building a better picture of the work tens of thousands of Australians carry out, often for free, to battle weeds, feral animals and other invasive threats to the environment.

Almost 94% of respondents rated invasive animals as either a 'very high' or 'high' threat to Australia’s native plants and animals, nearly 93% rated 'weeds' and 'all invasive species' in those two highest categories, while just under 92% rated habitat loss as either a 'very high' or 'high' threat.

The 'combination of climate change and invasive species' rated just over 88 per cent.

Fire ranked the lowest, followed by climate change.

The overwhelming majority of those surveyed are tackling weed problems (92.2%), and just over half are working on invasive animals issues.

Surprisingly, just 6 per cent said they are working on invasive marine problems, and 12 per cent are tackling invasive diseases.

Both a lack of funding and general awareness among the Australian public about how invasive species are harming our native plants and animals are proving the greatest obstacles to tackling invasive species.

More than half of respondents blamed a lack of strong laws and policies for hampering their organisation’s ability to combat invasive species. Finding volunteers is also a problem.

Which invasive species does your organisation work on?What’s needed from government?

Wide ranging answers were given for what governments at local, state and federal levels could be doing better to tackle invasive species, including:

  • Fund massive control and eradication programs to knock back feral populations of rabbits, cats, foxes, deer, cane toads etc.
  • Approach invasive species in the same style of co-ordination as bushfire control, with a centralised body and funding, with well co-ordinated paid and volunteer actions.
  • Awareness campaigns.
  • Ban the importation of new pasture grasses. Make industry contribute to off-farm impacts. Research biological controls for rampant escapees.
  • Ban all weed species from importation and distribution.
  • Ban cats in sensitive areas and control them elsewhere.
  • Employ and train more people to tackle the issues.
  • Enforce declared plant legislation at the landholder level.

The survey also revealed the huge levels of both volunteer and paid hours being put into tackling invasive species in Australia. This information shows both the high cost of tackling invasive species and the interest in the community in contributing to control efforts.

Who completed the survey?

More than a thousand groups, including small and large conservation groups, Bushcare, Landcare and NRM groups, as well as local councils and Friends of groups, were contacted as part of the survey.

Just over 800 completed the survey and represented a broad cross-section of organisations working on invasive species problems in this country including Landcare and Coastcare groups, bush regenerators, NRM bodies, environmental consultants, government agencies and research organisations.

The survey results will be used to create an Australian database of groups working on these issues, and to help us better share information on current invasive species threats and the opportunities for improving laws and policies.

The Invasive Species Council would like to thank the Ian Potter Foundation for its generous support in making this project possible.

Aug 082013
 

The ConversationOriginal story by Susan Moore, Murdoch University; Betty Weiler; Brent D. Moyle, and Paul F. J. Eagles, University of Waterloo at The Conversation

Despite what many commentators on The Conversation have said, conserving biodiversity in our national parks isn’t the way to save them. Parks need visitors to get vital community and political support.

We have to get more people into national parks if parks are to have a future. Photo: Flickr/Tatiana Gerus

We have to get more people into national parks if parks are to have a future. Photo: Flickr/Tatiana Gerus

Parks, like every other institution on this planet, are a social construction. Those reserved in the 19th century reflect the values of those times – health and pleasure for humans. In recent decades, social values have led to a strong focus instead on conserving biodiversity.

New moves to include grazing, logging and recreational shooting are a reflection of current efforts of some groups to re-construct the purpose of parks.

If park managers and other advocates don’t like these moves to change national parks into resource extraction reserves, they have to enlist the support of visitors.

Parks need people

Conserving biodiversity isn’t enough. It is time for a renewed focus on visitors and their needs. Appreciating the full gamut of park opportunities is essential.

We need people in parks, because people vote and parks don’t. Parks are a public institution, like hospitals, schools and prisons, and they rely on public interest and support for funding.

Strong advocacy from park visitors for environmentally friendly experiences, like wildlife viewing, photography, hiking, swimming, canoeing and camping, can counter-balance pressures for environmentally destructive activities such as hunting and grazing.

People visiting national parks can have extraordinary experiences, through witnessing beautiful scenery and connecting with nature, escaping the urban environment, and reconnecting with family and friends. Promoting these experiences is essential for the political and financial support of parks.

Park visitors also matter economically. Tourism accounts for about 10% of GDP internationally. Wildlife viewing and outdoor recreation (both largely centered on protected areas) are two of the fastest growing sectors. In Australia, the nature-based tourism sector contributes an estimated $23 billion to the economy each year.

But visitor numbers to landmark national parks such as Uluru are currently declining. Recent data from Australia, Canada, the United States and Japan shows visitor numbers to parks are static or declining on a per capita basis.

One potential reason for this decline could be growing competition from electronic media and other more accessible home- and community-based recreation options. Some people find it hard (or think it’s going to be hard) to get to national parks. Recent migrants may not know how or why to visit national parks.

Concerns that fewer and fewer humans are experiencing nature were first expressed in the 1970s. Serious related consequences include declining environmental knowledge and concern (manifested as declining support for parks), the emergence of nature deficit disorder in children, and increasing mental and physical health issues.

The threat of extinction of the park visitor experience is a real possibility. This threat to parks is more insidious than stock grazing or timber removal. With this extinction potentially comes a waning in societal support for parks as we know and appreciate them today.

Park agencies must develop creative, productive partnerships with the tourism industry to protect biodiversity while providing opportunities for visitors at the same time.

Environmentally friendly activity in parks is preferable to possibly destructive activities such as hunting and grazing Photo: Flickr/yewenyi

Environmentally friendly activity in parks is preferable to possibly destructive activities such as hunting and grazing Photo: Flickr/yewenyi

A visitor focus

By acknowledging that an alliance between parks and visitors is essential for the future of parks, programs and strategies can be put in place to entice visitors and enhance their experiences.

Social media and technology could engage and retain the support of visitors. Apps to help locate parks, find and follow walk trails, identify birds and enter sightings on an interactive data base, or book campsites online, are all simple ways of attracting and retaining visitors.

Enhancing visitor experiences and maintaining biodiversity conservation is a complicated balancing act. Park workers will need further skills development, especially in understanding, providing for and evaluating the visitor experience.

Park visitors come from a very broad cross-section of society, all ages and all lines of work, both nationally and internationally. Politically, park visitors are a much larger group than are those who wish to extract resources from parks. They just need to be politically active.

Ultimately, parks rely on societal support for survival. The solution for parks lies in ongoing interactions between those passionate about biodiversity and those with other interests to construct and re-construct the purpose of parks in the decades ahead. Visitors are a critically important part of this dialogue. They can provide an important counter-balance to more utilitarian interests, such as grazing and logging.

Susan Moore receives funding from the Australian Research Council, the Australian Government and several State Governments. She recently completed research for The Parks Forum, the peak industry organisation for parks agencies in Australia and New Zealand. She is a governor for WWF-Australia and a member of the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas.

Betty Weiler receives funding from the Australian Research Council and industry partners including Parks Victoria, WA Department of Parks & Wildlife and NSW Office of the Environment & Heritage.

Brent Moyle has conducted research in partnership with Parks Victoria, the Department of Environment and Conservation (WA), the Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW) and the Parks Forum.

Paul F. J. Eagles is affiliated with the World Commission on Protected Areas.

The Conversation

This article was originally published at The Conversation.
Read the original article.

Aug 082013
 

Original story at SWNS.com

A family who watched a dolphin leaping in front of their kayaks were stunned after it caught a huge fish - and dropped it in front of them for their dinner.
Dave, the dolphin that leapt out of the water with a fish and dropped it into a family’s boat

Dave, the dolphin that leapt out of the water with a fish and dropped it into a family’s boat

The group had spent several minutes enjoying the mischievous mammal which started swimming around their canoes off the British coast.

But to their astonishment the friendly animal then dived down and dropped a massive cod next to Lucy Watkins, 14.

The dolphin then resurfaced and began nudging the whopping 10lbs fish towards the stunned teenager.

Lucy and her grandparents wondered whether they should pick up the floating offering in case the dolphin wanted it for himself.

But the dolphin then resurfaced seconds later with his own fish - this time a seabass – and began tucking in.

The family gratefully scooped up the cod, which weighed a massive 10lbs, before taking it home to nearby Combe Martin in Devon to cook for their tea.

Lucy said: “He definitely wanted me to have his fish. He first dropped it 20ft away but then pushed it to within 5ft of my kayak.

“Everyone was watching on the beach and we caused quite a stir when we paddled in with the cod.”

Schoolgirl Lucy Watkins was astonished by the friendly dolphin which gave her dinner.

She said: “It was amazing to see the dolphin. I have always had a love for them so going out to see one was very exciting.

“As we got out of Combe Martin bay we started to see the dolphin splashing around I couldn’t believe my eyes it was so much bigger then I thought it would be.

“Once it started going under my kayak I felt comfortable with it and so I started playing with it, splashing my hands and feet in the water.

“I made me happy enough, and then all of a sudden it gave me the fish.

“To have this awesome creature which I had loved since I was little to give me a fish that it would normally have for dinner made me feel on top of the world.

“When it was time to leave I didn’t want to go.”

Lucy Watkins at Combe Martin, Devon with her cod supper

Lucy Watkins at Combe Martin, Devon with her cod supper

Grandma Nina added: “It was as if he was saying to Lucy ‘Don’t worry, now I’ve got a fish to play with and so have you. This is mine for my tea, you have that one for yours.’

“He was just so playful and content to be around us. Lucy was dangling her fingers in the water and he seemed to be attracted by that.

“If I hadn’t seen it myself I’d never have believed it. My theory is that he was lonely and wanted human company. He was with us for about two hours.

“It seemed rude to refuse him so we took the fish and had cod and chips for supper.
It was massive – I’ve still got half in the freezer.”

Lucy was paddling off Combe Martin Bay with Mike and Nina, both, 52, when they encountered the dolphin.

The animal has become so popular with locals they’ve christened him Dave.

After putting on an impromptu ‘aquabatics’ display by circling and diving beneath them, Dave surfaced clasping a giant cod between his jaws and dropped it beside Lucy’s kayak.

Dave the dolphin is a regular site off Combe Martin Bay, where he frequently entertains families and tourists in the pretty coastal beautyspot.

Nina, a swimming club coach, said the July 25 sighting was the highlight of Lucy’s school holidays.

She said: “We feel so privileged to have been there. Lucy loves dolphins and has always wanted to swim with them.

“Well she didn’t get to swim with this one, but it is the first time she has seen one out of captivity.

“With the crystal clear water, it was such an experience.”

A spokesman for Whale and Dolphin Conservation said: “This is a very interesting account.

“There are many examples worldwide of dolphins interacting with humans. We would just make our usual appeal for people to generally keep their distance.

“Dolphins can sometimes become distracted by humans, lose their awareness of nearby motor boats and sustain injuries.”